【作者】 刘锋；

【导师】 崔卫华；

【作者基本信息】 东北财经大学 ， 旅游管理， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 旅游作为一种普遍的社会经济现象,受到很多外部因素的影响,其中交通出行方式就是其中之一。尤其是随着科学技术的进步,出行方式和速度的巨大变化对客源地和目的地的旅游经济起到了至关重要的作用。近几年,我国快速轨道交通的发展正逐渐改变着国内游客规模的空间分布和结构。通过快速轨道交通出行的游客越来越多,以往省外和境外的旅游者,在旅游景点的选择上,多选择目的地有较高知名度和影响力的旅游景区及景点。如今,短途游、休闲游的旅游方式也渐渐趋于常态化。特别是高铁时代下,传统的经济圈内逐步形成的“N小时经济圈”不仅拉动了沿线城市的旅游经济还促进了经济圈内城市群中其他城市的旅游经济发展。因此,对新兴快轨交通导致的旅游经济差异的研究是有其必要性的。本文综合考虑到三个典型经济圈和开通时间较早的快轨专线,所以选取合宁线、京津线和武广线这三条专线上的七个沿线城市作为研究对象,运用标准差、变异系数和地理集中度等方法,分析了从2006年到2011年的春节和国庆黄金周假期各条专线城市的旅游经济时空差异的变化情况。论文的主要内容如下：首先,对论文的研究背景和意义、研究目的及研究方法、路线作简要阐释,阐明在城际铁路、动车、高铁等快速轨道交通快速发展的大背景下,对于研究出行方式改变对客源地和目的地旅游经济差异影响的必要性进行说明；其次,对本文中所涉及的区域经济理论、绝对差异、相对差异及地理集中度相关概念和理论进行解释,并就国内外研究历程和现状进行梳理,形成本文的文献综述。再次是研究设计,主要通过政府统计网站、旅游网站、统计年鉴和网络新闻数据对研究对象的相关旅游经济指标数据进行搜集和整理,根据相关公式对数据进行运算,就数据图表的变化趋势先做直接表述后对旅游经济指标的差异变化和发展趋势做适当合理的判断,简要小结不同类型城市问的差异情况并尝试对形成该现象的原因进行论断。最后,由特殊到一般,通过归纳总结形成普适性的结论。但可以看出,由于快轨交通的兴起时间并不长,所以对旅游经济差异的影响还需要通过更多的数据和事实去验证,所以本文的结论还需要以后更深入的论证。通过对研究对象间的旅游经济差异变化的分析,主要得出以下结论：①快轨交通对旅游经济和资源差距悬殊的两地影响较大,虽然发展滞后者的旅游经济也会随着快速轨道交通的变化而产生深刻变化,但较之发展基础雄厚的城市而言,二者的绝对差异可能还会逐渐扩大。②快轨交通使得旅游的形式更趋于休闲化,这便使得地域间旅游人次的绝(相)对差异与旅游收入的绝(相)对差异的变化趋势相比可能出现并不一致的现象。③沿线城市及周边地区的旅游经济并不一定会有所改善,这取决于地区间的文化差异程度和旅游资源的异质化程度。④对于越来越休闲化的往来游客,若其中一地将要、正在或已经举办了大型赛事或重大节庆活动,那么该地吸引的入境游客会产生突增现象,因而与其他城市旅游经济指标的差距相比也会相应放大。⑤快轨交通正逐步拉近城市群内各城市的距离,游客往来这些城市的次数会越来越频繁,也从一定程度上缩小了城市间旅游人次的地理集中度,进而集中程度也更加趋于均衡。更多还原

【Abstract】 Tourism.as a kind of general socio-economic phenomenon, is affected by many external factors.including the transportation way. Especially with the scientific and technological progress.the great changes of trip mode and speed has played a crucial role in source and destination tourism economy.In recent years.the development of China’s rapid rail transportation is gradually changing the spatial distribution of the size and structure of domestic tourists. There are more and more tourists By the way of rapid rail transit travel. Past many tourists outside the province,in the choice of tourist attractions,chose the tourism areas and attractions having a higher visibility and influence in the destination. Today,the short travel and leisure travel have gradually become normalization. Peculiarly in the high-speed rail era.there has formed the "N-hour economic circle" in the traditional economic circle. It is not only stimulating the tourism economy along the city also contributed to tourism development of other cities in urban agglomerations. Therefore.the new differences of tourism economy caused by fast-track traffic is indeed a need for research.This article comprehensively took into account the three typical economic circle and the earlier lines. So this paper selects the Hefei-Nanjing line.the Beijing-Tianjin line.and the Wuhan-Guangzhou line,the seven cities along the three lines as the object of study.and uses standard deviation,coefficient of variation and Geographic concentration.to analyse the city’s tourism economy of line in spatial and temporal changes from 2006 to 2011 Spring Festival and National Day Golden Week. The main contents of the paper is as follows:First.briefly explain research background and significance,research objectives and research methods,the route. Clarify,under this background of the inter-city railway,moving vehicles,high-speed rail and other rapid transit rapid development,studying changes of the way of travel is the need to explain the difference for source and destination; Secondly,explain related concepts and thearies like regional economic theory.the absolute differences,relative differences and the geographical concentration.and sort out to study cause and condition to form this literature review. Then.the part of study design:primarily through the Census and Statistics website.travel sites,Statistical Yearbook.and data on the study of network news collect and collate data related to tourism and economic indicators.according to the relevant formula compute the data.after explain trends in the data charts directly determine appropriately and reasonably the tourism economic indicators expressed in different changes and trends.do a brief summary of the differences between different types of cities and try to form a conclusion that the reason of causing the phenomenon. Finally.from the particular to generalization,draw a universal conclusion by summarizing. But we can see that,due to the short time of fast-track traffic rising,so the impact on tourism economic differences also need more data and facts to verify.then this conclusion needs further proof.Through the study of differences between the changes in the economic analysis of tourism.the paper mainly draws the following conclusions:①Rapid rail transportation has great impact on two cities having a huge gap on tourism economy and resource although those of tourism lagging behind developed areas will produce profound changes with the rapid rail transit.but compared to the developed urban.the absolute difference between the two may be gradually widened.②Rapid rail transportation makes travel be more leisure,which will make trend different between inter-regional tourism trips absolute difference(relative difference) and tourism income absolute difference(relative difference).③Tourism economy along the city and surrounding region may not be improved. It depends on the degree of cultural differences and the degree of tourism resources heterogeneity between regions.④For more leisure tourists.if one of cities will hold.is holding or has held a large-scale events or major festivals.the entry to attract tourists will have a sudden increase and,therefore.economic indicators gap will be enlarged accordingly with other cities.⑤Because of rapid rail transportation is gradually narrowed the distance within the city group between cities.the number of visitors traveling to these cities will become increasingly frequent and condition from a certain extent reduces tourist number and geographic concentration among cities.making more concentration Balanced.更多还原