【作者】 高扬；

【导师】 何晓萍；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 教育技术学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 学习过程是教育技术学的主要研究对象,课程体系作为学习过程中的重要环节,是衡量一所学校教学水平和学术水平高低的重要标准,反映了现代科学技术的发展趋势和社会经济的发展需求,决定了专业人才的培养目标、规格和质量,是教学改革中的重点和难点。好的课程体系设置,符合学生的认知结构,便于教学大纲的实施和学业的顺利完成,使学生循序渐进地吸收和消化新知识,轻松自如地实现知识从低级到高级间的有序迁移,达到较好的学习效果。对课程体系的评价是论证课程体系设置是否科学可行的重要手段。其评价方法应该有一个合理的层次结构,定性分析和定量研究相结合,符合学科的发展趋势；其评价结果对专业课程设置的合理性、科学性给予公正的论述,它能对整个课程架构的各个环节进行监督和考评,起到良好的导向作用。本文采用文献研究法,结合国内外课程体系评价的研究现状,采取理论与实际相结合的方式,以南昌大学电子信息工程专业为例,对其专业背景、培养目标和专业方向进行调查分析；以学习层级理论做为研究的基础理论；以实地采集的课程因子作为基本评价单元,建立了包涵4个准则性指标、36个课程性指标的评价指标体系；采用层次分析法确定各级指标的权重,采用模糊综合评价法来构造判断矩阵；运用FAHP法对收集到的反馈数据进行分析处理,并利用目标矩阵分析法进行课程设置合理度的论证,评价“电子信息工程”专业课程结构“比较满意”。采用上述方法同样可以论证其他学科的专业课程体系是否科学、合理。若评价结果低于“比较满意”,则职能部门要组织相关专家进行课程论证并予以修正,保证其课程结构的优化,使学科教学更加符合社会经济的发展和需要。因此,课程体系结构的评价研究,对于推动课程结构的优化,提升教学质量具有一定的借鉴作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 The learning process is the focus in the study of educational technology. As an important link in the learning process, the curriculum system is an important standard to measure a school’s teaching level and the academic level, which indicates social and economic development and decides the training target and the quality of professional talents.A good curriculum system settings usually agrees with the students’ cognitive structure to help them to absorb and digest new knowledge, marching in the knowledge path from the low to the high level.The evaluation of the curriculum system is an important means to demonstrate whether the curriculum is scientific and feasible, where the evaluation method calls for a reasonable structure, which includes qualitative analysis and quantitative research, and the evaluation results determine and examine every component of the whole structure by analyzing the curriculum setting.This paper takes electronic information engineering in Nanchang University for example, analyzing its professional background, training objectives and professional direction by means of documentation. The author sets up an index system including 4 criteria indexes,36 course indexes by field collection unit, using analytic hierarchy process to determine the weights at all levels, taking the FAHP to construct the judgment matrix, and using the method of FAHP to analyze collected data, then using the method of Matrix chart approach to argument the reasonable of the course arrangement. Finally, it has been demonstrated that the structure of "electronic and information engineering" course is "satisfactory".Whether the curriculum system of a specialty is scientific or reasonable can be demonstrated by using these methods. If the evaluation results are below the "satisfactory", the functional departments should organize the related experts to argue the curriculum, correct it to ensure its curriculum structure’s optimization, and impel the subject teaching to fit with the development of social economy and needs. Therefore, the evaluation study for the curriculum system performs a role in the optimization of the course structure and the improvement of teaching quality.更多还原