【作者】 杨文娟；

【导师】 李敬国；

【作者基本信息】 西北师范大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 长期以来现代汉语语法界一直把带“得”字的程度补语和状态补语混为一谈。虽然现代汉语语法学中已经对补语有一定的界定,但以助词“得”连接的补语,即“述语+得+补语”(不包括表可能的)是一种十分复杂的结构,历来争议很多。本文以三个平面的语法理论为指导,选取历年关于程度补语和状态补语问题研究的具有代表性的观点,在整理研究成果的同时,通过将学者们的各种不同观点进行比较分析,对现代汉语带“得”字的程度补语和状态补语的纠葛问题进行分析讨论。全文包括以下五个部分:第一章、引言部分。简述了本文的研究缘起和范围为带“得”字的程度补语和状态补语,讨论了这两种补语的研究现状和划界,进而引出研究意义和研究方法,并介绍了本文的语料来源。第二章、带“得”字的程度补语研究。分析了带“得”字的程度补语的三种分类,在结构句法、语义、语用方面的特点。第三章、状态补语研究。讨论了状态补语的特点,从结构句法、语义、语用角度出发,研究了状态补语的复杂性,多样性。并引入了金立鑫先生的“次级谓语”说和“后置状语”说对状态补语进行了讨论。第四章、在对外汉语教学上的策略。针对带“得”字的程度补语和状态补语在教学上的难点,他提出相应的教学策略。第五章、结语部分。总结了本文的观点,指出了本文的不足与缺陷,并指出了今后进一步的研究方向。更多还原

【Abstract】 The world of Modern Chinese Grammar has long confused complements ofdegree with“de”and complements of state with“de”. Although Modern ChineseGrammar has defined complements, because of its complex structure, the complementconnected by the auxiliary word“de”(i.e.“predicate + de+ complement”, notincluding those describing possibilities) has always been a topic of much controversy.Based on the grammatical theory of three planes, the present study has made acomprehensive study of the representative views on complements of degree andcomplements of state, and done a comparative analysis on these different views. Onthe basis of this analysis, the controversial issues of the complements of degree withde”and complements of state with“de”are discussed. Accordingly this paperincludes five parts as follows:(1) Introduction. In this part, the genesis and scope of the present study ispresented, the state of the field and the delimitation of the two kinds ofcomplements discussed, and the significance and methods of the research areintroduced. In addition, the corpus sources of this research are also presented.(2) Exploring the complements of degree with“de”. In this part, an analysison the three classifications, the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristicsof the complements of degree with“de”is performed.(3) Research into complements of state. In this part, the characteristics ofcomplements of state are discussed and the complexity and diversity ofcomplements of state investigated from syntactic, semantic and pragmatic angles.Furthermore, the "Sub-Predicate" theory and "Post-Adverbial" theory areintroduced for the discussion of the complement of state.(4) Strategies on the teaching of Chinese to foreigners. In view of thedifficulties in the teaching of complements of degree with“de”and complements of state with“de”, some teaching strategies are offered in this part.(5) Conclusion. This part concludes the thesis, and points out thelimitations and recommendations for further research.更多还原