【作者】 陈冰；

【导师】 郭义贵；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 一群尿毒症患者因为无法承受医院昂贵的透析费用,自发组合成了一个自助透析室。买来简陋的仪器,在没有专业医护人员的条件下进行透析治疗,在一个几乎被世人遗忘的角落顽强地活着。但北京市通州区卫生局依据相关条例取缔了该自助透析室。这个事情经媒体报道后,舆论一片哗然。取缔自助透析室,尿毒症患者的生命可能无法继续;不取缔自助透析室,不符合相关的法律法规。两难命题之所以产生,是因为两个合法的权利交叉重叠,处于对抗冲突状态,两个权利的同时实现成为不可能。这是一个权利冲突的问题,在社会主义法治不完善的中国,权利冲突在现实生活和司法实践中普遍存在,而权利冲突却常常被忽视。笔者试图引入权利冲突理论来分析和解决“自助透析室”事件。本文分成四部分:第一部分引言,介绍自助透析室事件的基本案情。并与绵竹灾民哄抢运往重灾区物质被免除法律处罚事件做对比,引出要讨论的权利冲突问题。第二部分,该案中存不存在权利冲突?通过三段论形式,卫生部门的取缔行为是否合法?尿毒症患者的自助医疗行为是否有合法?如果二者都合法,那是什么权利的冲突?第三部分,如果存在权利冲突,那为什么会产生权利冲突?第四部分,如何解决权利冲突问题?更多还原

【Abstract】 A group of uremic patients because can not afford the expensive hospital fees, spontaneously formed a self-dialysis unit, bought crude instrument, making dialysis treatment in the absence of medical professionals, tenacious living in an almost forgotten corner. However, Tongzhou District, Beijing Health Bureau ban the self-dialysis unit in accordance with relevant regulations. This matter by the media, the public uproar. Self-dialysis room ban, the life of uremic patients may be unable to continue; Self-dialysis unit is not banned, do not comply with the relevant laws and regulations. Dilemma propositions are arise, because the legitimate rights of the two overlapping, in a state of confrontation and conflict, the two rights realize is impossible. This is a rights issue of conflict, inadequate rule of law in socialist China, conflict of rights is prevailing in real life and judicial practice, but the conflict of rights is often overlooked. This paper attempts to introduce the conflict of rights theory to analyze and solve the "self-dialysis room" incident.This article is divided into four parts: the first part of the introduction, the basic self-dialysis unit incident case. Mianzhu shipped with the worst hit victims of looting of material are exempt from legal punishment incident to do comparison, leads to the conflict between rights to discuss.The second part, are there conflict between rights in this case? By syllogism form, the health sector against acts legal? Self-care behavior of patients with uremia have legitimate? If both are legitimate, what is the right of the conflict? The third part, if there has the conflict of rights, then why creates conflict between rights? Part IV, how to resolve the conflict between rights?更多还原