【作者】 王俊；

【导师】 陈宏光；

【作者基本信息】 安徽大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 行政仲裁作为行政机关解纷机制的一种重要方式,其在行政管理实践中为化解社会纠纷、解决社会矛盾发挥了重要作用；行政仲裁作为一种权利救济方法,为纠纷当事人寻求权利保护提供了重要保障；行政仲裁制度作为行政管理制度中的一项重要制度,为转变政府职能、实行柔性管理提供了重要契机,也是创新社会管理、构建和谐社会的重要实践。我国行政仲裁制度经历了《仲裁法》颁布前的辉煌和《仲裁法》颁布后的暗淡。近年来,行政仲裁作为多元化纠纷解决机制的一种重要方式,越来越受到学术界和实务界的重视。我国目前的行政仲裁制度无论在理论研究上还是制度建设上都显得相当不足,这与实践上强烈需求矛盾突出。正是基于此原因,本文将对行政仲裁制度这一重要课题作出较为系统的研究。本文共分为六个部分：第一部分：多元纠纷解决机制与行政仲裁。本部分主要介绍了多元纠纷解决机制产生的背景、纠纷解决方式的历史变迁以及纠纷的行政解决机制与行政仲裁。第二部分：行政仲裁制度的基本理论。本部分从四个方面对行政仲裁的基本理论加以分析：一是行政仲裁的概念。通过对不同时期不同学者对行政仲裁概念的解读分析,笔者提出自己的行政仲裁概念；二是行政仲裁的特征。笔者通过行政仲裁与民事仲裁、行政裁决、行政复议以及行政调解的比较,得出行政仲裁的自身特征。三是行政仲裁的性质。比较分析学术界关于行政仲裁的三种性质定位,笔者提出自己更加倾向于行政仲裁属于行政司法行为的主张。四是行政仲裁的价值。公正与效率是行政仲裁制度的生命,行政仲裁恰好平衡了公正与效率二者之间关系。第三部分：国外相似制度的基本概况。本部分主要介绍了美国的行政裁决制度、英国的行政裁判所制度和日本的当事人争讼制度,通过对美、英、日相似制度的分析为我国行政仲裁制度的构建和完善提供了域外借鉴经验。第四部分：我国行政仲裁制度的历史发展及现状分析。本部分首先回顾了行政仲裁制度的历史发展,然后简单介绍了我国现行的几类行政仲裁制度,最后重点剖析了我国行政仲裁制度面临的问题,尤其是我国行政仲裁制度面临的法律依据不足、行政仲裁的独立性和公正性难以保证、行政仲裁程序缺乏统一规定、行政仲裁救济不力等严重问题。第五部分：我困行政仲裁制度的完善。本部分首先就我国行政仲裁制度的必要性与可行性作出了重点阐述；然后针对我国现行行政仲裁制度中存在的问题提出完善对策,这也是本文的亮点所在。笔者提出了构建我国行政仲裁法以及行政仲裁程序法的法律体系、保证行政仲裁独立性与公正性的法律制度以及完善行政仲裁制度的救济方式等。第六部分：结语。通过分析行政仲裁制度的实践现状与发展趋势,笔者得出,行政仲裁必将作为多元纠纷解决机制的一支重要力量,为解决社会纠纷、化解社会矛盾作出重要贡献。更多还原

【Abstract】 Administrative arbitration as a means of dispute mechanism of the Executive, in its administrative practice for resolving social disputes, resolving social contradictions play an important role.Administrative arbitration as a kind of right remedy for Parties in dispute seeking rights provides an important safeguard. Administrative arbitration system as an administrative system is an important system for the transformation of government functions, the implementation of flexible management provides an important opportunity and also provides an important practice of social management innovation, and building a harmonious society. Our country has experienced the administrative arbitration system issued by the arbitration law before the brilliance and promulgated by the arbitration law after dark, in recent years, administrative arbitration as multiplex dispute resolution mechanism of a kind of important ways, more and more get the attention of the academic and practice. China’s current arbitration system administration in both theoretical research or building systems have become quite inadequate, which is the obvious contradiction between the strong demand in practice. It is for this reason, this article will issue administrative arbitration system to make more of this important system. This article is divided into six parts:Part one:Multiple dispute resolution mechanisms and administrative adjudication. This section focuses on the diverse background of dispute resolution mechanism, the historical change of dispute settlement and administrative dispute resolution mechanisms and administrative arbitrationPart two:the basic theory of the administrative arbitration system. This part of administrative arbitration from four aspects the basic theory analyzed:One is the concept of administrative arbitration. Through different scholars of different period of administrative interpretation of arbitration concept analysis, the author puts forward his own administrative arbitration concepts; Two is characteristic of the administrative arbitration, the arbitration and civil arbitration by administration, administrative rulings, administrative review and administrative mediation, draw comparison of the characteristics of administrative arbitration. Three is the nature of the administrative arbitration. Comparative analysis on administrative arbitration academic three properties positioning, the author puts forward himself more inclined to administrative arbitration belongs to administrative judicial behavior claim. Four is the value of administrative arbitration. Justice and efficiency is the life, the administrative arbitration system of administrative arbitration exactly balanced the relationship between justice and efficiency.Part three:the basic situation of foreign related system. Introduced in this part of America’s administrative ruling system, Britain’s administrative judges’ system and Japan’s party dispute, By the United States, Britain, Japan similar to the system of administrative arbitration system for our country to build and improve the experience of providing extra-territorial reference.Part four:the history of Chinese administrative arbitration system present situation and development analysis. This section firstly reviewed the historical development of the administrative arbitration system, then introduces several kinds of China’s current administrative arbitration system, finally analyzed with emphasis in our country’s administrative arbitration system, especially the problems facing the administrative arbitration system faces legal basis insufficient, the independence and impartiality of administrative arbitration to guarantee and administrative regulations, the lack of uniform arbitration procedures of administrative arbitration relief strength etc serious problem.Part five:Perfection of Chinese administrative arbitration system. This section first to the arbitration system of administrative necessity and feasibility of the highlights; and arbitration system for China’s current administrative problems in a complete set of measures, and this is where the highlight of this article, the author proposed in Administrative Law and Arbitration administrative arbitration law legal system, ensure the independence and impartiality of administrative arbitration legal system and improve the administrative system of remedies such as arbitration. Par six:Conclusion. Administrative arbitration system by analyzing the situation and development trend of the practice, the author draws, administrative arbitration as diverse dispute resolution mechanism will be an important force to resolve social disputes, make an important contribution to resolving social conflicts.更多还原