【作者】 赵志华；

【导师】 王艳华；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 民商法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 随着现代公司制度引入人力资本理论,经理在公司治理中的地位不容小视。公司所有权、经营权的分离与“经理革命”的出现,逐渐将经理推上了企业的重要位置。经理利用其日渐膨胀的权力,频繁侵害股东和公司的利益。实践中,经理往往成为公司治理中最薄弱的环节。经理居于公司治理结构的重要位置,对经理权如何定位便成为优化公司治理结构的核心问题。如何保障经理充分发挥广泛的职权,同时予以必要的限制,就成为各国公司法面临的难题。我国《公司法》中的相关规定仅涉及经理职权,并无经理权的具体内容,学术界对此也讨论甚少。笔者运用比较、分析以及归纳的方法,对公司经理权能、权限以及法律规制等问题进行了尽可能详细的探讨。在搜集国内外成功经验和考察有关立法的基础上,针对公司经理权的相关缺陷提出了我国未来立法中的对策和设想,以期促进我国现代企业制度的建立和公司法的进一步修改完善。全文除引言外共分五个部分,基本行文思路如下：第一部分是关于公司经理权法律规定的现状。首先简要介绍了经理在大陆法系、英美法系以及我国法律中的概念界定。从古典企业时代、股份公司时代和知识经济时代三个时期出发,阐述“经理问题”的由来与演变过程。同时以经理权的内涵为依据,着重分析了经理权在设置方式、权限范围以及限制方式上存在的不尽合理之处。第二部分主要围绕公司经理权的法律基础展开讨论。它山之石,可以攻玉。通过对大陆法系和英美法系的相关法律规定进行比较研究,总结世界各国对经理权源的立法经验。结合相关理论学说,为完善我国的经理权制度提供有益参考。第三部分深入分析讨论经理权的设置方式和权限范围。通过经理权的三种设置方式即任意模式、法定模式和选择模式,分析得出结论：我国公司中经理权的设置方式应具体情况具体分析。从公司经理与董事会、股东、第三人的多元化法律关系中寻找经理的角色定位,并在此基础上限定经理权的范围。第四部分以探讨制约公司经理权的机制为中心。详细讨论为什么要对经理权予以制约,即分析制约经理权的必要性。并在此基础之上,探讨制约经理权的具体措施及表现。得出结论：对经理权的制约应充分发挥股东、董事会以及监事会对经理层的有效制约机制。第五部分结合我国经理权的立法现状,并借鉴相关国外经验,完善相关立法。从经理权的权限范围、限制方式、授予方式以及行使方式等方面对我国经理权相关内容提出立法建议。从股东、董事会以及监事会对经理的监督三个角度,完善我国经理制度的内部监督机制。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the modern enterprise system introduce the theory of human capital, the role of managers in company’s governance can’t be overlooked. The separation of own and management in modern companies as well as the advent of the management revolution push managers to enterprise’s key status. It is very universal that the powers and authorities possessed by corporate manager expand incessantly to damage investor’s and company’s interest. In practice, the managers usually become the weakest point in the company’s governances. Managers play an important role in the modern corporate governance structure, how to locate corporate managers’legal status turn into the key issues in the improvement of corporate governance structure. A great many of foreign company law have to face how to exploit fully the ability of the manager, and to limit the manager’s power. In China, Company Law only has set manager’s powers,but there is not content related with the right of company’s manager. what’s more, academies circles discuss it unusually. By the methods of analysis, comparison and generalization, this article elaborately discusses the question in respect of the corporate manager, such as the feature, limitations and functions. On the basis of collecting the successful experience, combing with investigation of the relevant legislation in the advanced countries,this article puts forward some suggestions and assumption in the light of drawbacks about the company managers’ power of the Chinese Company Law amendment in the future. It is beneficial for promoting the establishment of the modern enterprise system and further improvement of the Chinese Corporate Law.Apart from the Introduction, the article contains five main parts as follows:Part one talks about the present situation and problem in connection with legal rules of the company managers’power. Firstly introduce various definitions of the manager between civil law system and common law system, especially legal rules of China. It mainly discusses the origin and evolution of the management revolution from three stages, the traditional business, the stock company and knowledge economy times included. Meanwhile, in this basis, it is necessary to pay much attention to shortcomings including award, range and limit about managers’power.Part two mainly discusses company managers’power on the basis of legislation. We can learn each other’s experience to make up for the inadequacies on our own account. By means of comparing relevant laws and regulations between civil law system and common law system, this part makes a conclusion on the legal experience in nations of the World. Combining with the relevant theory, it provides a useful reference to perfect the manger’s power system in our country.Part three analyses deeply award and range about the manger’s power. We can take a conclusion from three types of legislation mode about corporate managers’ power that award modes should adapt the actions to local conditions. From multidimensional legal relationship between the company manager and shareholders and the board of directors, it is liable to make a reservation about the manager. So the range of the manager’s power can be limited.Part four talks over constraint mechanism of the company manger’s powers. Give the discussion on why it is necessary to restrict the company manger’s powers.In other words, the content analyzes the necessity that constraint mechanism is set up.It follows to analyze the current situation of commitment mechanism in connection with the manager’s power on the basis of development process. The discussion can draw a conclusion that shareholders the board of directors and the board of supervisors should constraint the manager’s power adequately.Part five improves legislation about the manager’s power in my country, combing with present situation in law and lessons from foreign experience. The article gives opinions about the manager’s power of my country in the aspects of scope, registration system, authorizing procedure and executing mode. At the same time, on the basis of diversity relationship between the company manager and shareholder, the board of directors and the board of supervisors, it completes internal supervision mechanism about the manager system in China.更多还原