【作者】 刘平；

【导师】 周文革；

【作者基本信息】 湖南科技大学 ， 外国语言学及应用语言学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 翻译理论的一个基本问题就是如何描述和解释译者在翻译中所扮演的角色。然而翻译理论界对译者在翻译中的地位问题一直以来都争议很大,至今没有达到共识。在传统的翻译理论中,译者的身份被定义为“仆人”,不仅要为作者服务,还要为读者服务。翻译研究被简单地分成为两个问题。第一个问题是探讨“怎样译”;第二个问题是“怎样译得好”。这种情况从根本上抹杀了译者的主体性。20世纪60年代出现的解构主义把译者从奴役的地位解放出来,赋予了译者前所未有的自主性。本文从解构主义的翻译理论出发,分析了译者主体性的内涵,从解构主义的互文性,不确定性和创造性三个角度体现了译者主体性在翻译过程中的发挥,并以翻译实例具体分析了译者主体性在实际翻译中的体现。尽管解构主义也有弊端,但是它对于译者主体性的提升以及对翻译研究视野的拓展所做出的贡献是无法忽略的。本文以解构主义的翻译观为理论基础,采取描述、对比和例证的研究方法,对译者主体性进行探讨。全文共分为六章。首先是引言部分,对主体性和译者主体性的定义进行界定以及在传统和后现代理论下译者主体性的文献综述。接下来是理论框架,阐述了著名解构主义翻译家的翻译观点。然后文章主要说明从解构主义互文性角度如何体现译者的显性。译者作为阅读者理解文本,作为解释者解释文本,作为改写者改写文本。接着主要说明从解构主义不确定性角度如何体现译者的任务,阐述译者如何展示原语语言和原语文化的差异。紧接着文章就是主要说明创造性是解构主义的要义,也是解构主义最根本的特点。创造性是体现译者主体性最基本的方面。最后是结论部分,总结解构主义视角下译者主体性的发现,局限性和研究前景。更多还原

【Abstract】 In translation studies, one of the basic questions is how to describe and regard the translator’s role. Up to now, the translation theorists have never got to a consensus as to the translator’s status in translation. In traditional translation theory, the translator is usually considered the servant who not only serves the author but also the reader. Besides, translation studies are simply divided into two questions: one is how to translate and the other is how to translate well. In such a case, translator’s subjectivity is completely neglected. But deconstructionism, which appeared in the 1960’s, endows the translator with unprecedented subjectivity.This thesis, from the perspective of intertextuality, uncertainty and creativity in deconstructionism, gives a definition of translator’s subjectivity, then analyzes the subjectivity from the above three perspectives and finally gives some elements which can exert great influence on the subjectivity. To sum up, this thesis holds a positive view of deconstructionism that emphasizes translator’s subjectivity. Moreover, deconstructionism offers a totally new way of dealing with translator’s subjectivity and promoting translator’s subjectivity to a greater extent. Although deconstructionism has defects, what provides for translation studies such as translator’s subjectivity in research area should never be ignored. The thesis, based on deconstructionism translation theories, adopts the methods of description, comparison,and illustration to make a detailed study of translator’s subjectivity.The thesis consists of six chapters. It first gives a clear definition of translator’s subjectivity and then has a general review of studies on translator’s subjectivity from the perspectives of traditional and postmodernism theories. Then the thesis introduces deconstructionism theory, which is the theoretical base of the thesis. It introduces deconstructionism translation theories from a number of famous translating theorists, including Derrida, Benjamin, Barthes and Venuti. Chapter three analyzes translator’s subjectivity from the intertextuality angle in deconstructionism. It shows translator’s subjectivity from the visibility of translator. In Chapter Four, the author analyzes the subjectivity from uncertainty in deconstructionism, which includes illustrations of translator’s subjectivity: the task of the translator is to present the difference of source language and source culture. Chapter five first proposes creative treason, and then it explains that the essence of deconstructionism is creativity, and finally it demonstrates creativity as the basic feature of translator’s subjectivity. Finally, the concluding part, summarizes findings and limitations from deconstructionism theory and proposes further studies.更多还原