【作者】 宝音图；

【导师】 张秀玲；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 在我国,量刑在刑法学中被称为“刑罚的裁量”,是指人民法院根据行为人所犯的罪行及刑事责任的轻重,在定罪的基础上,依法决定对犯罪分子是否判处刑罚,判处何种刑罚、刑度或所判刑罚是否立即执行的刑事审判活动。1长期以来我国司法实务界一直受“重定罪,轻量刑”和“重刑主义”传统思想影响,量刑问题一直没有得到应有的重视,直到最近几年才有部分法院的重视量刑问题。通过调研发现,量刑不规范现象在我国比较突出,普遍存在罪刑不相适应、刑种适用比例失调、量刑情节认定不规范与经验量刑方法不科学等问题,究其深层原因主要是：刑罚配置的法定刑不尽合理,刑法理论界在量刑领域的研究不足,司法实践经验未得到有效总结与规范,法官理论水平偏低,自由裁量权过大、法官个人素质不高以及审判体制的制约等。目前,我国的量刑规范化改革已经势在必行,为此,本文从实体和程序方面进行了反思与重构,通过反思我国现阶段量刑原则、量刑方法和量刑程序方面的问题和弊病,介绍欧美国家在量刑方面的一些好的做法和经验,主张在我国应从实体上建立自己相对独立的量刑指南,以便统一均衡量刑,杜绝量刑不公现象的出现；主张在我国建立独立的量刑程序,引入对抗式量刑方式、量刑建议制度、被告人人格调查制度等,从而扭转我国现阶段量刑不透明的现状,规范量刑的方法,从而更加切实的保障被告人的合法权益。更多还原

【Abstract】 In China, the sentencing in the criminal law refers to "discretionary punishment", which means, upon the conviction, according to the crimes the perpetrators committed, the severity of the crimes and the criminal responsibility, the criminal trial activities of deciding whether to sentence, or if sentence, what kind of penalty should be, to what penalty degree, and if the sentence is implemented immediately by the People’s Court. Chinese judicial practice has long been subject to the traditional thoughts of "heavy conviction, light sentence" and "heavy penalty doctrine". Sentencing issue has not received due attention until recent years. Now part of the courts began to pay attention to the problem. The investigation related found that the phenomena of non-standard sentence are prominent in China:crime and punishment is not fit; the criminal species applied are imbalanced; the way to affirm the sentencing details is non-standard; and sentencing methods are based on unscientific experiences. The main underlying reasons are:the unreasonable allocation of legal punishment to penalty, the inadequacy of theoretical sentencing study, the lack of effective summary and regulation of judicial experience, the low proficiency in law theories of the judge, too much discretion to the judges, and the restriction from the trial system.At present, the standardization of sentencing reform is inevitable. This paper is to reflect and reconstruct this point from the substantive and procedural aspects. By knowing the principles, methods, and procedures of sentencing, especially some problems, and introducing some good practices and experiences in Europe and America, this paper advocates establishing our own independent sentencing guidelines in China, so as to uniform balanced sentence, put an end to unfair sentencing phenomena; advocates establishing an independent sentencing procedures, and introducing adversarial penalty method, sentence proposal system, and pre-sentence investigation in China, in order to reverse the current opaque sentencing situation through the standard method of sentencing, which is more effective to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the accused.更多还原