【作者】 王维民；

【导师】 宋海春；

【作者基本信息】 东北师范大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 以行政程序控制行政权,从某种意义上说就是通过行政程序证据控制行政权。行政程序证据决定着行政行为的合法性,决定着行政行为的效力,同时也决定着一个国家执法水平和民主化水平。因此对我国行政程序证据制度进行探讨和研究,对推动我国行政程序证据制度立法,切实保障行政相对人的合法权益具有重要理论意义和现实意义。本文主要是运用统计分析、比较分析、实证分析、逻辑分析等方法进行研究的,主要内容如下:第一,行政程序证据制度是一类独立的证据制度,与诉讼证据制度相比,具有自身的特点和功能。第二,域外如美国、德国、奥地利及我国的澳门等国家和地区都有统一的行政程序法典,并在行政程序法典中规定了证据规则。域外行政程序法中的证据制度尽管繁简不一,但在内容上既具有很大的差异性,又具有一定的趋同性。第三,我国无真正意义上的行政程序证据制度可言,行政执法实践中行政机关只得照搬行政诉讼中严格的证据制度,这是不可取的,也是不可行的,会在理论上、实践中、执法效果上造成诸多弊端。第四,我国行政程序证据制度的构建应在侧重学习和借鉴域外行政程序法典中的证据制度的根本原则指导下,从以下三个方面进行总体把握:首先从其价值取向上,我们所设计的行政程序证据制度的价值取向应是注重效率兼顾公平。其次从其立法体例上,应由统一的行政程序法来规定其基本的规则,由单行法律法规规章作补充,规定不同的行政行为的特殊规则。再次从对内容的设计上,其基本思路应按照“取证—举证—质证—认证”的程序来设计。先形成一个总体框架,将来再不断进行丰富和完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 In a sense, Administrative program controlling the executive power is through the evidence of administrative procedures to control the executive power. The legality of administrative acts, level of law enforcement and democracy are determined by the evidence of administrative procedures. Therefore, it has important theoretical significance and practical significance for promoting the Chinese evidence of system of administrative procedures legislation and protecting the legitimate rights of the administrative counterpart to explore the evidence system of administrative procedure in china. The issue focuses on the four part using statistical analysis, comparative analysis, empirical analysis and logical analysis methods:Firstly, the evidence system of administrative procedures is independent and has its own characteristics and functions compared with the litigation evidence system.Secondly, the United States, Germany, Austria and China’s Macao and other countries and regions et al have a uniform code of administrative procedures where the rule of evidence has been set forth. The evidence system of their administrative procedures exist the difference and convergence.Thirdly, there is not the real evidence system of administrative procedure in China. It is not desirable and feasible for administration organs have to comply with the administrative litigation evidence system in their administrative law-enforcement practice. These actions will cause many problems in theory, practice and law enforcement effect.Fourthly, in order to build the Chinese evidence system of administrative procedures, the following three aspects should be obeyed under referencing the extraterritorial evidence system of administrative procedure in their administrative Procedure Code: from its values, the efficiency and fairness should be emphasized; from its legislation style, its basic rules should be decided by unified administrative procedure law and the special rules of administrative acts be decided by single independent laws, regulations or rules; from its content, a general framework should formatted in accordance with "obtaining evidence–producing evidence-interrogation-confirmation" process and enriched and improved in the future.更多还原