【作者】 陈晶；

【导师】 梁传杰；

【作者基本信息】 武汉理工大学 ， 教育经济与管理， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 随着中央和地方政府对高等教育投入的增加,对投入之后产出的要求也在提高。社会大众已将关注的焦点由能否接受高等教育,扩大到教育质量是否符合社会要求、投入与产出的比例等方面。学科作为高校科学研究和人才培养的载体,其水平是衡量高校办学水平和整体综合实力的重要标志。因此,高校学科建设工作成为大众普遍关注的问题。伴随着我国科教兴国战略的实施,国家先后启动了“211工程”和“985工程”。如何提高高校学科建设的投入产出效率,使高校能够充分发挥其办学职能,高校学科建设的研究具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。绩效管理作为较为科学的评价方法,在企业中的应用已取得一定的成效,但是高校的应用尚属于探索阶段。绩效管理中的绩效评价理论和方法为高校学科建设绩效评价研究提供了新的研究视角。本文先对本选题国内外研究现状进行梳理与分析,然后引出高校学科建设绩效评价概念,阐述了构建高校学科建设绩效评价的原则和方法,通过实证研究,针对当前高校学科建设绩效评价中的问题,从宏观层面提出了相应的对策。本文重点研究了高校学科建设绩效评价体系的构建,通过文献资料法、定量分析法等多种方法,搜集构建高校学科建设绩效评价体系所需要的数据,并借鉴了相关的研究成果,确定了高校学科建设绩效评价的人力资源、财力资源、物力资源、科学研究、人才培养等5项一级指标,正高职称、副高职称、中级职称、初级职称、国家的专项投入、高校自筹经费投入、科研项目、科研成果、人才培养规模、人才培养质量等10项二级指标,并确定其权重。该体系的建立,为高校学科建设的研究提供了参考。文章最后通过数据包络分析法和矩阵图法对部分教育部直属高校学科建设绩效进行实证分析,并提出了提高高校学科建设绩效的对策。本论文的创新之处在于：一是对高校学科建设绩效的内涵进行了界定；二是在研究方法上,将数据包络分析法与矩阵图法相结合,实现了研究方法上的创新。更多还原

【Abstract】 With the central and local governments to increase investment in higher education, and growing requirement of the output. Focus the attention of the people has access to higher education by the ability to expand to the quality of education in line with the requirements of the ratio of input and output areas. Discipline is scientific research and personnel training as a university carrier. Important sign is measured at the level of university and overall comprehensive. Therefore, disciplinary construction works into the public issues of common concern. With our technology and education strategies implemented, the state has started the "211 Project" and "985 Project." How to improve the disciplinary construction of input-output efficiency, and to give full play to their school’s college functions, the construction of university research subject of great theoretical and practical significance.Performance management as a more scientific evaluation method, in the enterprise’s application has certain effect, but the college application still be considered. Performance Evaluation Performance Management in theory and method of construction for the performance evaluation of Discipline provides a new perspective. Article focuses on the research status of the topics to sort out and analyze, and performance evaluation leads to disciplinary construction concept for building disciplinary construction principles and methods of performance evaluation, through empirical study, for the current disciplinary construction problems with performance evaluation, made from a macro level, the corresponding countermeasures.This paper focuses on the University Discipline System Performance Evaluation, through literature, quantitative analysis and other methods to collect Discipline in Colleges and Universities system performance evaluation data needed, and draws on relevant research results, to determine university Evaluating the Performance of subjects on human resources, financial resources, material resources, scientific research, personnel training, etc. 5-level indicator is the Senior title, Vice-Senior title, Intermediate grade, junior title, the country’s specific input into self-financing college, research projects, research funding, research results, scientific research bases, personnel training scale, quality of personnel training of 12 secondary indicators, and determine its weight. The system established disciplinary construction and provided a reference. Finally, the paper data envelopment analysis and the matrix part of the tuition on the subject the empirical analysis of building performance and proposed to improve the performance of university academic building measures.The innovation of this paper is:first, the meaning of Discipline building performance was defined; the second is the research method, data envelopment analysis and the matrix on the Combination, the research methods to achieve innovation.更多还原