【作者】 韦娟；

【导师】 李卫国；

【作者基本信息】 贵州大学 ， 法律， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 审级制度是国家司法制度的重要组成部分,是一项基本的诉讼制度。审级制度体现了诉讼的基本价值取向,是现代诉讼程序从人治到法治的标志。科学的审级制度使诉讼案件在不同级别的法院进行审理,有利于案件事实的查明,纠正下级法院判决、裁定中可能发生的错误,保证法律的正确适用；同时,有利于提高裁判的公信度,满足当事人的合理要求,缓解或化解其不满情绪。科学的审级制度还蕴含和体现了程序公正的诉讼价值理念,反映了国家对当事人特别是遭受不利裁判的当事人诉讼地位的尊重。由于历史文化、诉讼传统等方面的因素,我国现行民事诉讼审级制度虽有其优点,但亦有其缺陷。本文试通过对我国现有的民事诉讼两审终审制度的缺陷以及近几年涉诉信访量不断增加等现象进行分析,结合审判实践中遇到的问题,通过借鉴国外的审级制度,结合我国的现实情况,试对我国的民事审级制度进行重构,建立两审终审为主,一审终审和三审终审为辅,严格再审的审级制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 The trial-level system is an important part of the national judicial system, a basic litigation system. The trial-level system is a reflection of the basic value of the proceedings. It’s a sign that the modern proceedings from the rule of man to the rule of law. A science trial-level system can find out facts of the case and correct the lower court decision to ensure the correct application of the law through the various levels of judicial proceedings; it enhance the degree of the Court referee’s convinced to meet the reasonable demands of the litigants, and mitigate or resolve their discontent. Science trial-level system also contains and embodies the values of procedural justice proceedings, reflecting the respect of the litigant from the state, especially those who suffer the dominant position of litigation referees respect. Since the history and culture, legal traditions and other reasons, our current trial-level system has its advantages, but also its shortcomings. This paper analyzes the defect of current trial-level system and the phenomenon of increasing the amount of letters and visits, combined with practical problems encountered in the trial, by referring to foreign trial-level system, studied with China’s the reality,we propose to the view that reconstruct our country’s civil trial-level system:two trial final appeal system as the mainstay, restricted one trial final appeal system and three trial final appeal system as the complement; Retrial system of strict.更多还原