【作者】 王立强；

【导师】 张海燕；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 管辖权问题关乎案件进入法院的“入口”是否妥当、正确,其解决的是整个民事诉讼制度的肇始环节的有关问题,是评价民诉程序正当性和判决有效性的标准之一,亦是迈向实体正义、实现程序正义的第一步。然由于管辖制度本身的复杂性、司法裁判活动特有的个体性以及争讼行为内在的对抗性等因素,决定了受诉法院与其他法院之间、争讼主体与裁判者之间以及争讼主体相互之间就管辖问题必然存在意见相左或权益冲突之情形,并加之当前地方保护主义思想的影响,在民事诉讼实务中难免会出现法院受理本无管辖权的案件之情形。为了避免和克服这个问题,使民事诉讼程序的正当性及裁判的有效性得到保障,当事人的合法权益得到保护,以最终实现对法院行使管辖权的监督,以及保障管辖制度贯彻落实,有必要设置救济性程序,管辖权异议制度便是其中之一。我国现行民诉法对管辖权异议的规定较为原则抽象,有关司法解释亦不甚周全,学术界对管辖权异议的概念、主体、客体范围的界定尚有争议,故而致使司法实务中对该制度的运用出现混乱现象。因此,从理论上论证及从程序设计上完善管辖权异议制度已刻不容缓。本文从管辖权异议制度的基本理论、程序问题及对滥用管辖权的规制、“规避”管辖权等若干问题进行深入研究,并深入分析产生问题的深刻根源及症结所在,并在此基础上对管辖权异议制度提出修改和完善的建议。并针对司法实践中错用管辖异议权行为和滥用管辖异议权行为寻找解决之道,从而保证民事诉讼管辖异议制度之功能得以最佳发挥。本文共分四部分:第一部分管辖权异议制度概述。对管辖权异议的概念、主体、客体、提出管辖权异议的时限及形式以及法院对管辖权异议的处理程序进行阐述,对当前管辖权异议制度的现状进行分析。第二部分管辖权异议制度的价值分析。从微观角度、宏观角度对管辖权异议制度的价值进行分析,并通过分析其当下现实意义,以引起人们对该制度的重视及关注。第三部分我国民事诉讼中管辖异议制度的缺陷。从管辖权异议的主体、客体、提出的期限及形式以及法院处理程序等角度分析阐述管辖权异议制度的缺陷和不足之处。第四部分我国民事诉讼管辖异议制度的完善。发现问题,找出问题的症结所在,最终是为了解决问题,使我国民事诉讼管辖异议制度更趋完善,通过拓宽提起管辖权异议的主体范围、增加管辖权异议客体范围、合理确定提出管辖权异议的期间、完善管辖权异议的处理程序、对滥用管辖异议权的当事人进行惩戒等不同角度,提出完善我国民事诉讼管辖异议制度具体方法和建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 Jurisdictional issues relating to appropriateness, correctness of the case into the court "entry" and its solution is part of the onset of the problem in the entire civil litigation system, one of the criteria of the evaluation of the justice of civil procedures and its effectiveness of the decision, and also the first step to substantive justice and procedural justice.The system of jurisdiction itself due to the complex nature, as well as the unique individuality of the activities and inherent adversarial behavior results in conflicting opinions or interests among courts, the subjects in litigation and the judges as well as the subjects themselves. In addition, local protectionism in civil proceedings will inevitably leads to the court having no jurisdiction over the case it is holding. In order to avoid and overcome this problem to protect the legitimacy and effectiveness of civil procedure and the legitimate rights of the parties are protected, achieve the supervision of the court to exercise jurisdiction, as well as to implement the system of jurisdiction, it is necessary to set relief procedures, one of which is the system of objection to jurisdictional. On current times there is a chaos in use of objection to jurisdictional due to China’s current Civil Procedure Law only providing some abstract principles of this system, the relevant judicial interpretations not very comprehensive, academic study having conflicts to the concept, subject and object of this system. Therefore, it is essential to define the theory and design the procedure to improve the system of objection jurisdiction. This article in-depth analyses the causes of problems arising and on this base giving some advices to to amend and improve the system from studing the basic theory, procedures, regulations and so on. Then this article tries to find solutions against the misuse and abuse of the system of objection jurisdiction in the judicial practice, thus ensuring the function of this system enformed. This article is divided into four parts:The first part is an overview of the the system of objection to jurisdiction, including the concept, subject, object, time limit and form of objection to jurisdiction and analysis of the court dealing with the procedures on the current system. The second part analyses the value of the system, including analysis of the value of the system from both the microscopic point of view and the macro point of view as well as the current value of system, through which to arouse people’s attention and concern of the system.The third part analyses the deficiencies in China’s legal system of objection to jurisdiction, including the deficiencies in subject, object, time limit and form as well as the procedures over disputes.The fourth part giving some advices for the improvement of China’s system of objection to jurisdiction. As we know, identifing the problems and finding the crux of the problems is to ultimately solve the problems, that is to say to make the system of objection to jurisdiction even better. The author gives some detailed solutions and advices such as broadening the subjects and objects to raise objection to jurisdiction, setting a reasonable time limit, completing the procedures for handling objection to jurisdiction, punishing the party abusing the right of objection to jurisdiction and so on.更多还原