【作者】 赵娟；

【导师】 王方戟；

【作者基本信息】 同济大学 ， 建筑设计及其理论， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本文选取了两组具有可比性的案例——第一组:葡萄牙建筑师阿尔瓦罗·西扎((?)lvaro Siza)设计的安东尼奥·卡洛斯·西扎住宅(Casa António Carlos Siza.1976-78)和上海嘉定秋霞圃的游骋堂区域;第二组:西班牙建筑师阿尔伯托·坎波·巴埃萨(Alberto Campo Baeza)设计的加斯帕住宅(Gaspar House,1992)和苏州网师园的五峰书屋,分别比较每组的两个案例之间的相似性与差异性,在相似性中得到具有启发性的设计方法,在差异性中理解中国古典园林设计的独特逻辑。这种比较研究展示了一种可能性:去除时代背景、风格样式、建造手法等等因素,中国古典园林(主要是江南小型私家园林)或者是园林中的空间局部可以单纯地作为一种建筑案例,以对等的姿态与现代建筑进行个案的比较研究。这对于在当代的背景下发掘和借鉴园林中的设计方法具有重要意义。本文期望通过有限的篇幅对这种比较研究做一些初步的尝试。本文针对具体的某个园林中的一处局部空间进行详尽的分析阅读,希望能够提供一个对中国古典园林微观阅读的视角,并展示这种微观阅读有别于追求共性的宏观造园原理研究的意义。比较和图解分析的方法是这篇论文在两组案例中贯穿始终的研究方法。每组案例之间具有相似的空间尺度和设计方法,提供了案例之间可比性的基础。论文分为四个章节:第一章为绪论。介绍论文的缘起、研究目的、研究内容以及研究方法,对论文所需要申明的问题做基本的交待。第二章和第三章为以上两组案例的比较分析。第四章为结论和展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 Two pairs of cases have been chosen in this thesis. The first pair is Casa Antonio Carlos Siza (by Alvaro Siza in 1976-78) and the You Cheng Tang region in Qiu Xia Pu (in Shanghai, China); the second pair is Gaspar House (by Alberto Campo Baeza in 1992) and the Wu Feng Shu Wu in Wangshi Garden (in Suzhou, China). Each two cases were compared with their similarities and differences.These comparative studies show a kind of possibility: without regard to the differences in histories and traditional styles, the Chinese classical gardens (especially small private gardens in the South) or their parts can be counterpoints of modern architecture. And many excellent design methods are contained in them. This kind of research is important to our references to the Chinese classical gardens nowadays. The thesis is just a primary attempt.The detailed comparative researches are on certain one garden or even certain part of a garden, which are different from the researches on principles and theories about gardening. These researches are expected to provide some microcosmic angles of view about Chinese classical gardens and show the significances.Comparative study and diagram are the main measures of analysis here. Each two cases have similar scale and design method, which are the foundation of the research.There are four chapters in this thesis. Chapter One clarifies the reason, content and methods of the study. Chapter Two and Chapter Three are comparative studies between two pairs of cases. Chapter Four states the meaning and value of this research, finds out the enlightenment to the architectural design, and confirms the next research direction.更多还原