【作者】 王倩；

【导师】 韩长印；

【作者基本信息】 上海交通大学 ， 民商法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 我国破产法第31条、32条列举了破产撤销权的适用范围并规定了例外条款,但是此条文过于抽象,缺少明确的构成要件及限制条件。尤其没有明确例外条款中何为“使债务人财产受益”等内容,使此类例外规定在实践中难以操作。但是债务人在破产前夕,其有些行为在客观上可能是正当的,不仅不会对破产财产造成损害,甚至有益于破产财产。所以,如果不予区分而将条款中所规定的行为均予以撤销,不仅会使某些债权人的利益受到不利影响,给第三人带来损害,而且立法的规范指引作用就会使交易过程中人人自危,在交易中时刻担心行为将来可能被撤销,而这必将损害破产程序开始之前正常的商事活动的效率及稳定。本文在对美国破产撤销权适用要件及其例外进行介绍后,结合我国目前的破产实践和破产立法现状,提出了关于破产撤销权适用范围例外规定的建议,指出立法中应明确破产撤销权的构成要件并规定其适用例外的具体情形,希望能为以后的破产法完善和适用提供一些参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 Article 31 and Article 32 in the Bankruptcy Law list the scope of the avoidance power and regulate the exception. But the articles are regarded quite abstract because of the lacking of specific requirements and restraints. The vague definition of the repayment of debts is beneficial to the debtor’s property increases the difficulty of applying this exception clause.However, before the bankruptcy procedure begins, the acts of the creditor and debtor are likely to be for the normal operation of the enterprise. If all these acts will be voidable without discerning,the interest of the innocent creditors would be negatively influenced. What’s more, it would become very difficult to eliminate the misgivings of the creditor that their dealings could be avoidable. Consequently, the normal business efficiency and stability will be violated.This paper is purposed to give some suggestions on the perfection and modification of the statutes on the avoidance power, by analyzing the U.S. statutes and relevant research on that matter as well as basing on the current practice and legislation in PRC bankruptcy law.更多还原