【作者】 袁慧贤；

【导师】 高芙蓉；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法律， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 民事再审程序不是解决民事争议的独立程序,而是一种特殊的补救程序,再审制度的功能之一是纠正裁判瑕疵,并实现当事人的权利救济。民事再审程序是在民事一审、二审程序终结之后,对已经发生法律效力但确有错误的判决和裁定予以纠正的程序。虽然新修订的民事诉讼法及最高人民法院出台的解释和意见对我国民事再审程序进行了大幅修改,但是这些法律对民事再审程序的改革仍然存在不彻底,仍然遗留有很多问题没有解决,如启动主体过多、再审次数无限制。鉴于此,有必要继续对民事再审程序的再完善进行研究。本文从民事再审程序的概念入手,对民事再审程序的理论基础进行了分析,在对两大法系国家的相关制度进行比较研究的基础上,针对我国现行民事再审程序存在的问题,提出了一些改革的思路和具体设想,以期对民事再审程序的再完善有所裨益。更多还原

【Abstract】 Civil retrial procedure is not the solution to civil disputes, but an independent special remedial procedures, the one of the functions of the civil retrial system is correct referee flaws, and realize the right remedy of the parties. Civil retrial procedure is first and second in civil proceedings that have occurred after legal effect but is wrong judgments and orders rectify the program. Although the new revision of the civil procedure and the supreme people’s court on the introduction of the interpretation and opinion to our country civil retrial procedure a substantial changes. But these laws on the reform of civil retrial procedure still exists not completely, still exist many unresolved issues, such as startup subject overmuch, retrial times unlimited. In view of this, it is necessary to continue to perfect the civil retrial procedure again. This article analyzes in detail the concept of civil retrial procedure, analyzed the theoretical basis for the countries of two important legal systems relevant system on the basis of comparison and study, in view of the existing civil retrial procedure existent problem, put forward some reform ideas and specific ideas, in order to perfect the civil retrial procedure help again.更多还原