【作者】 刘涛；

【导师】 翟宝辉；

【作者基本信息】 北京林业大学 ， 结构工程， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 城市是迄今为止人类生存和居住的最佳聚落形式。城市建设发展的主要矛盾是人与环境的对立统一,目的是为了让人更好的生存。伴随城市与人需求之间的矛盾,人们也在一直探索城市发展的理想模式,城市发展理念也不断更新。宜居城市的概念从提出到发展经过了十几年,被认为是能解决目前城市发展问题的比较有效的途径,很快便在全世界的城市发展理念中得到了广泛的认可。本文在回顾了宜居城市产生的背景和城市宜居性理论研究现状后,认为宜居城市应该是一个人与自然共同协调、可持续发展的动态目标。而对于如何评价城市的宜居性,已成为今后宜居城市研究的主流。本文选取了国内外三种城市宜居性评价指标体系,即经济学人智库的世界最佳居住城市评选指标体系、大温哥华区“宜居区域战略规划”指标体系和我国的宜居城市科学评价指标体系。通过资料收集,从评价主体、评价目的、体系架构到近期结果对三种指标体系进行了详细的解读。由于各个国家和地区的经济社会发展背景不同,指标体系存在多样性和差异性,关注领域也各有侧重,加之我国正式开展城市宜居性研究起步较晚,需要借鉴国外的先进经验来解决目前困扰我国城市发展的各种问题,这给指标体系间的对比分析提供了研究空间。本文提出以政治、经济、环境、社会四个方面为共同基础平台对三种指标体系展开对比分析研究,结合当前我国经济社会发展现状,遵循科学性、规范性、全面性、动态性和开放性的指标设置原则,建议在宜居城市科学评价指标体系中增加腐败水平、绿色GDP、城镇居民人均年收入增长率、城市禁止和限制开发区域的大小和保护情况、社区卫生服务机构接诊率、市民机动车保有量、按路上时间划分的交通模式比例、城市商品房、公共租赁房供应基本价格、公共租赁房占本城市住宅总量的比例九项指标,进一步完善宜居城市科学评价指标体系。更多还原

【Abstract】 City is the best settlement platform for human being by far. The main contradiction in the development of urban construction is unity of opposites between people and the environment, and the purpose in the city development is to make people living better. With the contradiction between people and the environment, people explore the ideal model of urban development all the time, and urban development concepts are constantly updated.The concept of livable city has been widely recognized among the concept of urban development, since proposed a dozen years ago. This paper reviews the background of the livable city and current livable theories, points that a livable city should be coordinated with people and nature, and a dynamic goal of sustainable development. For now, how to evaluate the city’s livability has become the mainstream of livable research.This paper selects three types of domestic and foreign livable city indicator system, such as the world’s livability ranking by EIU, livable region strategic plan indicator system by GVRD and livable city scientific evaluation index system. Based on the date collection, the paper interprets the three index system in detail from unit, aim, framework to recent results. In view of the difference among economic and social development background in each country and region, diversity of each index system and areas of concern, all of these provide the research space for comparison. The paper first comparatively studies the three index systems on the base of political, economic, environmental and social dimension. Then combined with the current status of economic and social development in China, following the principle of scientificalness, standard, comprehensiveness, dynamic and openness, some suggestions for the further research and development of the livable city scientific evaluation index system by CSUS are put forward, such as level of corruption, GGDP,growth rate of per capita income of urban residents, the size and protection of prohibitions and restrictions on the urban development, attendance rate of community health services, public ownership of vehicles, the proportion of transportation mode by the time on the road, the basic price of commodity housing and public rental housing, the proportion of Public rental housing in the city.更多还原