【作者】 段涛；

【导师】 张新民；

【作者基本信息】 西南大学 ， 民商法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 无论是在茹毛饮血的远古时代,还是在先进文明的当代,同性恋现象是客观存在的。纵观历史,由于多元化的社会意识形态和价值观的影响,社会对于同性恋现象的评价褒贬不一。由于所谓的“国情不允许”和立法工作的不完善,即使在现实社会中存在着大量的同性恋者,他们自身并不敢名正言顺地要求和主张自己的合法权益,就更谈不上缔结婚姻的权利了。由于中国经历了一个长期受封建文化侵淫的历史过程,使得中国的人们至今思想受其影响,进而导致了同性恋自身对其性倾向及身份的掩饰,也导致了同性恋者的应然权利得不到实现,最终得不到真正的幸福。在面对如此纷繁复杂的社会眼光和社会舆论的时候,是否应该确认和保障同性恋者的婚姻权利受到了来自社会各界的激烈争论。在这样一个没有立法制度去确认和保护同性婚姻权利的背景下,就会引发出许多社会、法律等各方面的问题。这恰好说明了确认和保障同性婚姻权对于一个国家的物质文明建设和精神文明建设的重要性。从另外一个角度而言,同性婚姻权的确认和保障又体现出一个国家法律制度的人性化程度以及对于以人为本这一和谐社会的核心理念的贯彻程度。对此建立一套确认和保障同性恋者婚姻权利的法律显得如此的重要。笔者认为,确认同性恋者法律层面的身份关系,即缔结婚姻关系有其存在的正当性。目前中国同性恋者法律身份关系缺失这一现状,是因为人们思想的发展并不能及时地与社会文化的发展相同步。当人们的思想不能适应文化的发展的时候,就会出现不理解、不认同、甚至是反对的声音。而面对同性恋以及同性婚姻权利这样一个本应该属于同性恋群体权利的时候,就会引起激烈的争议。解决此争议最好的方法就是国家通过立法来实现对同性恋及同性恋婚姻的保护,充分发挥法律对于社会的引导、教育、规范等作用。只有通过对同性婚姻的立法活动,才能(?)保障同性恋者的人权及其相关应然权利,从而达到社会的稳定发展和和谐发展。本文通过理论意义上的同性婚姻权和现实意义上的同性婚姻正当性性入手,窥探出同性婚姻立法的正当性,以及如何完善立法工作,从而全面地保障同性恋者婚后的各项相关权利。通过了解国外对同性婚姻立法与保障的现实情形,从而促使我国对同性婚姻的立法进程,保障我国同性恋者婚姻权利的实现。基于以上论述,笔者欲通过本文,更加清晰地论述同性婚姻立法对于中国社会的重要性,以及同性婚姻立法对于中国现实状况的现实性与正当性,从而实现同性恋者的权益保障,实现和谐社会真正的和谐。本文共6章,约5万9千字。一、绪论。这部分主要论述了论题的确立及其意义；国内外的研究现状；研究思路和研究方法等。为论文提供了基本研究背景、参考资料与研究前提。二、同性婚姻立法相关基本问题。这部分主要通过对传统婚姻与同性婚姻的法律界定等比较,重点介绍了什么是同性婚姻,具体包括同性婚姻的法律含义、同性婚姻的特点、同性婚姻的表现形式、同性婚姻立法的发展历史、同性婚姻立法的性质、同性婚姻立法的价值定位等方面。本部分的主要作用在于通过对同性婚姻相关概念的阐述,为后文同性婚姻立法的详细阐述起到铺垫作用。三、国外同性婚姻立法比较与启示。这部分主要通过介绍世界各国对于同性恋者缔结婚姻关系的态度以及具体的发展情况,向读者表明同性恋者缔结婚姻关系这一事实已经存在,让读者了解同性婚姻立法发展的情况是什么。同时通过比较世界各国对于同性婚姻立法的不同,为后文提出适合我国同性婚姻立法的具体措施等提供基础性、参考性意见。四、同性婚姻立法观点梳理及评析。这部分主要从社会调查数据与社会各界不同的态度、观点等方向入手对同性婚姻立法进行论证。说明同性婚姻立法具有正当性。五、同性婚姻正当性的法学分析。这部分主要通过不同的法学理论视角,分别论证同性婚姻的正当性。具体包括：法伦理学的视角(具体主要从法律与道德的关系这一方向入手对同性婚姻立法可行性进行论证)、法哲学的视角(具体主要从“正义”、“秩序”、“人权”的方向入手对同性婚姻立法可行性进行论证)、法文化的视角(具体主要从法文化与同性婚姻的融合入手对同性婚姻立法可行性进行论证)。六、我国同性婚姻制度的立法设想。通过比较世界各国同性婚姻的立法模式,构想出适合于我国同性恋者缔结婚姻关系的立法模式。通过对于前文的总体概括后,提出适合于我国同性恋者缔结婚姻关系的具体立法内容。这部分是对前面所有论述的一个总结与完善。其目的不仅是通过法律,矫正人们对于同性恋本身的误解,更重要的是,同性恋者的婚姻问题才‘是重中之重。因为婚姻问题不仅仅涉及到个人的幸福,也会涉及到不特定多数人的幸福的问题,因此同性婚姻立法具有其正当性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Not only in ancient times, but also in contemporary era, the homosexuality is being in our society. Reading from our history, people hold different opinions about it. Due to condition of a our country, many same-sex partners dare not stand for the point of view about their rights, even the marriage rights. Chinese people cannot understand the homosexual marriage because of their thoughts which effect on feudal culture. As a result, the same-sex partners have to conceal their sexual orientation, and their marriage rights cannot be came true. When the homosexual marriage become the hot topic in our society, protecting their rights is an important event. In the condition of lacking of legislation of homosexual marriage, it could lead to many society problems and so on. It goes without saying that legislating the homosexuality marriage for same-sex partner is becoming increasingly important and significant. One the other hand, stand for the point of view about their rights, even the marriage rights that could reflect the civilization level of one country. Legislating the rights of homosexuality marriage is necessary.Author insist that protecting the marriage rights for same-sex partner should be possible and valuable, or not people may hold some different attitudes, such as misunderstanding, disagree, even the opposites. The best way to solve these problems is legislation. Frankly speaking, we could protect the marriage rights of same-sex partner by the effect of law, leading, educating and regulating. That all goal is that our society becomes harmony.The thesis consists of six parts as follows:In the first part, this thesis introduces the basic development of homosexual marriage and same-sex partner, the basic researches about domestic research and overseas research, and the research methods for the thesis.In the second part, this thesis introduces the basic knowledge about the (?)ge, and the legislation of the rights of homosexual marriage. From this part, it could reflect the meanings, natures, features and so on.In the third part, this thesis introduces the homosexual marriage legislative mode of main countries. It contains Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, France, Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States and so on. Meanwhile, this thesis introduces different kinds of attitudes of experts.In the fourth part, author introduces all kinds of attitudes on same-sex-partner and homosexual marriage in our society. The aim is that educating people understand the same-sex partner and homosexual marriage.In the fifth part, author analyzes the possibility of legislating for same-sex-partner. It contains Law Ethics, Philosophy of Law, and Law culture. This thesis maintains that the homosexuality, homosexual marriage and the same-sex partner are non-pathological. People should show respect to the gay, and the law should protect their rights, especially the marriage rights.In the sixth part, this thesis introduces our country legislation on homosexual marriage, and draws blueprint or plan. Meanwhile, author gives some suggestions about legislation on homosexual marriage, the rights and obligations about the legislation on homosexual marriage. Author hopes that we must realize that we should put the homosexual marriage into the law.更多还原