【作者】 胡光；

【导师】 郑军男；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 刑法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 未遂教唆是刑法共犯理论中一个比较复杂的问题,对于未遂教唆,我国学者的专门研究并不多见,许多问题存在着争议,尚有待解决。本文从未遂教唆的概念出发,通过区分和界定未遂教唆及其周边近似概念,力图明确未遂教唆的性质与内涵；通过刑法理论的比较研究,论证未遂教唆的本质；从主观罪过和客观危害两个方面展开,分析未遂教唆的基本构成；在现行法律没有明确规定的情况下,以刑法解释学的视角,肯定了未遂教唆应受处罚并明确了其责任形式。全文分为五个部分。第一部分为历史源流与各国立法和和司法状况。通过对未遂教唆的历史来源进行梳理,以达到正本清源的目的；进而对目前各国各地区的立法、司法概况进行比较分析,吸收总结其经验教训,寻求可兹参考的借鉴。第二部分为核心概念的明确与界定。通过对德国、日本、韩国及中国台湾地区和大陆的未遂教唆的概念进行比较研究,对于未遂教唆倾向于作广义上的理解,即教唆人出于使被教唆人的实行行为一开始就只能以未遂告终的意思而进行教唆的情况。与此同时,对于“未遂教唆与教唆的未遂”、“未遂教唆与陷害教唆”这两组概念的内涵和外延进行了区分和界定,对以往出现混淆的概念加以澄清和解释,明确未遂教唆的性质。第三部分为未遂教唆的本质属性。通过持可罚说与不可罚说两种观点学者的争论,分别从共犯的独立性与共犯的从属性两个方面,分析未遂教唆行为,无论是以共犯独立性为出发点,亦或是以共犯的从属性为基础展开分析,未遂教唆中教唆者都是可罚的,进一步明确了未遂教唆的本质。第四部分为基本构成。首先通过对危害结果与犯罪故意之间关系的分析,明确了未遂教唆的主观罪过,对于造成了被害人现实紧迫的法益侵害危险和导致了被教唆人被刑罚惩治这两个方面的结果,教唆人都是存在故意的；其次通过对未遂结果的不确定性的阐释和讨论,肯定了未遂教唆的违法性和客观危害。第五部分为未遂教唆的处理和责任的追究。在现行刑法没有对未遂教唆行为做出明确规定的情况下,按照教唆犯处理是比较可取的；在具体处罚上,要根据行为发展程度和既遂结果发生与否等案件实际情况,区别加以追究。笔者旨在通过对未遂教唆的研究,促进刑法理论的进一步完善,借以指导实践,并为司法实践中公正、合理地解决有关问题提供一个依据。这也正是本文的选题意义所在。更多还原

【Abstract】 Attempted instigation is a very complicated problem in the theory of accomplices. There are just few scholars who are studying the attempted instigation in China. This test tries to clarify the nature and connotation of the attempted instigation by distinguishing and defining the concept of attempted instigation and the similar definitions. We get the argumentation on the essence of attempted instigation by means of the comparative study on Criminal law theory. The author analyses the structure of attempted instigation through two aspects:subjective offence and objective harm. Though there is no explicitly stipulated in the existing laws, the author confirms the attempted instigation’s strafbarkeit and defines its liability from the perspective of Criminal hermeneutics.The first part introduces the historical origin and some countries’legislation situation about the attempted instigation. We could find the source and foundation of the attempted instigation by clearing up its history. We could summarize and absorb the experiences and lessons through the comparative studying on the countries’ legislation about the attempted instigation.The second part is to clear and define the core concepts. After research the definition of the attempted instigation in Germany, Japan, Korea and Chinese Taiwan and Chinese Mainland, the author tends to understand the attempted instigation in the broad sense, which means that abettor does the abetting action in order to make the abetted criminal ending his or her crime attempted. At the same time the author distinguishes and defines the concepts between the "attempted instigation" and "unfulfilled instigation", as well as the concepts between the "attempted instigation" and the "agent provocateur". Finally the author will define the nature of attempted instigation through clarifying and explaining the confusable conceptions previously in this section.The third part is to talk about the essential attributes of the attempted instigation. The author analyzes the condemnatory foundation on attempted instigation in terms of the independence of accomplices and the subordination of accomplices. And we could draw a conclusion that the abettor in the attempted instigation is punishable in both aspect. After introduces the controversy between the punishable group and the unpunished group, the author further clears and definitudes the essence of the attempted instigation.The fourth part is to talk about the basic constitution of the attempted instigation. First the author analyzes the relationship between the harmful consequences and the criminal intent, and then defines the subject offence of the attempted instigation which is the actual and pressing harm for the victim, and the punishable consequences for the abetted person. And in whichever aspects, the abettor is intentional. Second, the author confirms the illegality of the attempted instigation through explaining the uncertainty of attempted results and discussing the causal complicity theory, manifest the illegality and the harmfulness of the attempted instigation.The fifth part is to discuss the form of processing and imputation on the attempted instigation in the context of Chinese criminal law. In the cases of that there are no definite regulations on the behavior of the attempted instigation in china, it is advisable to treat it as the abettor. In terms of the specific punishment, we should punish the crime according to the progression of the act and the occurrence of the criminal result.The author studies the attempted instigation in order to perfect the criminal law theory and guide the judicial practice. The study could further provide the guidelines for the judicial officer to solve problems impartially and rationally in the judicial practice. And this is also the significance of the author’s topic selecting.更多还原