节点文献
公司的社会责任
Corporate Social Responsibility
【作者】 刘潇;
【导师】 宋显忠;
【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 , 法学理论, 2011, 硕士
【摘要】 本文以公司的经济责任和公司的社会责任的矛盾和冲突为主线,针对公司社会责任的历史、法哲学定位、实施机制、制度完善四个问题,以富士康员工自杀案为分析样本,展开论述。旨在明确不同层面公司社会责任的法律效力的基础上,以比较分析的方法,借鉴域外先进的制度理念,对我国公司社会责任制度体系进行反思。文章第一部分,考证了公司社会责任的历史,从公司社会责任的起源与演进、思想渊源两方面论述。首先介绍不同历史时期的公司社会责任的理论、判例及立法;其次阐释了公司社会责任的思想渊源——社会利益观、社会利益观与公司社会责任相契合的基础、公司社会责任的基石范畴——利益相关人。第二部分,公司社会责任的法哲学定位。笔者以《公司法》第五条为分析依据,结合卡罗尔“企业社会责任金字塔理论”、富勒关于义务道德和愿望道德理论、“法律的要素”角度,分析认为,公司社会责任包括法律层面的公司社会责任和伦理层面的公司社会责任,《公司法》第五条规定的“公司社会责任条款”具有义务道德和愿望道德双重属性,并可以将其视为一项法律原则。第三部分,分析不同层面的公司社会责任的实施机制,以法律层面的公司社会责任为论述重点。首先界定了法律层面的公司社会责任的具体内容;分析它的可裁判性,直接裁判基础——契约责任,间接裁判基础——一体化方法;阐述法律层面公司社会责任的实践路径,这部分以法人人格否认理论为视角。其次论证伦理层面的公司社会责任在具体情况中存在的承担缔约过失、违约、虚假陈述等责任。第四部分,完善公司的社会责任的对策与建议。笔者认为,在程序法中,可在股东提案权方面完善公司社会责任的适用程序;在实体法中,从强化董事、监事、高级管理人员承担社会责任的机制和职工参与制度方面完善;在法制监督方面,完善公司社会责任的工作重点在于行政机关监督和社会舆论监督。
【Abstract】 This thesis takes the conflicts of corporate economic responsibility and social responsibility as its main thread, focusing on four major aspects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) which are CSR’s history, jurisprudential positioning, implementation mechanism and institutional improvement. The author spreads out the discussion by analyzing the case of "the jumping out of building in Foxconn", the aim of which is to make clear the legal effect of CSR from various aspects, thus to learn and draw lessons from other foreign developed countries, and to reflect how CSR is being practiced in China.The first chapter deals with the history of CSR. First, it discusses how CSR was originated and evolved, what CSR’s theoretical source was. It introduces the theory, legal precedents and lawmaking of CSR in different historical periods. Then it expounds the theoretical source of CSR, which includes social benefit view, how social benefit view and CSR are connected in a fundamental way, and the stakeholders---the key part of CSR.The second chapter is about jurisprudential positioning of CSR. By using the fifth article of the Law of Corporation as the basis of analysis, and by extracting valuable components from Archie Carroll’s "CSR pyramid "theory, LonL. Fuller’s morality of aspiration and morality of duty theory, the elements of law, the author proposes that CSR should include CSR in terms of law and CSR in terms of ethics. The author believes that the CSR clause in the fifth article of The Law of Corporations has double nature of morality of aspiration and morality of duty, and can be seen as a legal rule.The third chapter analyzes the implementation mechanism of CSR in different aspects with the legal aspects as the emphasis. The author first defined what is involved in the legal aspects of CSR, and went on analyzing how far it can be judged by law (justifiability). The direct judgment should be based on contractual obligation while the indirect judgment on the integrative method. Then the author discussed how CSR could be put into practice, in the context of the theory of "Disregard of the Corporate Personality". In the ethical aspects of CSR, the author believed, there exist such problems of contract negligence, agreement violation and false statement etc.The fourth chapter discusses the strategy and suggestion of how to improve the status quo of CSR. The author believes that in the Law of Procedure, procedures concerning shareholders’ proposal rights need to be improved. In substantive laws, related system needs to be improved on the commitment of CSR by the board of directors, the supervisors and the senior managers, and the participation of employees. In the area of legal supervision, the author believed, administrative organ supervision and public opinion supervision should be the emphasis in our work to improve CSR.
【Key words】 CSR (corporate social responsibility) Law; Ethics; Justifiability;
- 【网络出版投稿人】 吉林大学 【网络出版年期】2011年 10期
- 【分类号】D922.291.91;F276.6
- 【下载频次】509