【作者】 孙军；

【导师】 柳忠卫；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 伴随着“程序公正”的理念日益深入国人之心,有关司法程序的诸多问题正在引起从学界到实务界直至整个社会的高度关注。近几年来,日渐兴起的司法改革多数是把司法程序问题作为首要的切入点,将“司法公正”作为不断追求的目标。而检察机关试行量刑建议制度,正是以司法改革作为大背景的。从1999年4月北京市东城区人民检察院在全国率先实行量刑建议制度以来,到2005年7月最高人民检察院正式下发了《人民检察院量刑建议试点工作实施意见》,量刑建议制度作为刑事诉讼程序改革的一项重大热点内容,在理论界和实务界的积极推动下,正以强大的生命力植根于中国法治文化的土壤里,并越来越呈现出蓬勃的生机和活力。在追求“公正和效率”的前提下,近几年来,检察机关积极探索和试行当庭提出量刑建议的做法。把量刑问题公开化,也使法官在量刑时拥有了参考的依据,从而在量刑程序的透明性和可预测性等方面有了大幅度的提升,为量刑的公正提供了重要保障。本文首先对量刑建议权的概念和属性进行了界定,并对实行量刑建议制度的法理依据、实践依据及其价值进行了分析,认为量刑建议制度是符合诉讼原理要求,实现控审分离原则,加强审判监督的有力手段；其次,对域外量刑建议制度进行了考察,通过对两大法系代表性国家量刑建议权的比较研究,尝试总结出量刑建议制度的一般运行规律,为我国量刑建议制度的构建提供些许启发和参考；再次,对我国开展量刑建议的实践现状进行考量。由于我国现行刑事诉讼法中没有关于量刑建议的明文规定,法官自由裁量权过大,导致量刑不透明,当庭宣判率低,检察机关的抗诉职能得不到有效行使。目前一些基层检察机关正在进行量刑建议的试点工作,取得了很好的效果。最后,对我国的量刑建议制度提出了建构的设想。从明确法律地位、具体构架设计以及建立配套措施和制度三个方面阐述了建构我国量刑建议制度的构想。由于手头资料的缺乏,以及笔者的学识有限,文中观点很可能有诸多不成熟之处,恳请各位老师批评指正。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the just idea of the procedure is rooted in the hearts of the people day by day, the question of the judicial process causes the close attention of circle of theory, practice circle and even the whole society gradually, mostly the questions of judicial processes are breakthrough points of the flourishing judicial reform in recent years, pursuing the goal of the justice. The procurator organ launches and tries the system sentencing recommendations is put forward under the great background of this judicial reform. Since April of 1999,the people’s procuratorate of Dongcheng District, Beijing had taken the lead in implementing the system of sentencing recommendations in the whole country, and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate had proposed the implementation suggestion of pilot work in sentencing recommendations of people’s procuratorate by July of 2005,proposing a great hot contents that the system reforms as the criminal contentious procedure in sentencing recommendations, being planted in the soil of the culture governed by law of China the strong vitality under the active promotion of the circle of theory and practice circle, and demonstrate flourishing life and vigor more and more.Under the premise of pursuing "justice and efficiency", in recent years, the procuratorates actively explore and try the practice of making sentencing recommendations in court. To open the question of sentencing will also provide a reference for the sentencing of judges, increase the transparency of sentencing procedures and the predictability of the sentences, and protect the fairness of sentencing. The author first defines the concept and attribute of the power to sentencing recommendations, and analyze the theoretical basis, practical basis and values of sentencing recommendation system, then believe that sentencing recommendation system is an effective means of complying with the requirements of suit principles, realising the principle of separating the complaint and the trial and strengthening the trial supervision. Secondly, the author investigates extra-territorial sentencing recommendation system. Through the comparative study of the power to sentencing recommendations of representative countries of two law system, the author tries to sum up the general operation rules of sentencing recommendation system, then to provide some inspiration and reference for the construction of China’s sentencing recommendations system. Once again, the author investigates the practice status of China’s sentencing recommendations. Because there are no express provisions about sentencing recommendations in China’s existing Code of Criminal Procedure, the discretionary power of judges is excessive, which leads to opaque sentencing, low rate of court ruling, appeal functions of the procuratorates can not be exercised effectively. At present, some of the grass-roots procuratorates are carrying on pilot work for sentencing recommendations and some have achieved good results. Finally, the author put forward a tentative plan to build the system of sentencing recommendations in our country. It includes the following three aspects:establishment of the legal status, design of specific framework and construction of matching measures and systems. Due to the lack of information on-hand, and the limited knowledge of the author, there are likely many immature views in this paper. Please give me as much criticism as possible. Thank you, my teachers and readers.更多还原