【作者】 王玮；

【导师】 苏振华；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 行政管理， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 90年代中后期,协商民主的发展唤起了对代议民主及工具型合法性的反思,倡导自治、公民参与、公共利益等民主价值的回归,契合了现代公民参与所申张的治理路径与制度,因此,以协商民主为宏观政治背景,对协商民主自身制度内蕴进行挖掘,实现其与既有制度的接洽,推动公民参与的制度建构,成为民主政治发展的可行途径与必然方向。文章运用文献研究法、比较研究法对民主理论的变迁路径进行了梳理,对我国公民参与的三个阶段中公民参与呈现出的特点进行了比较分析,归纳了现代公民参与主体组织化、参与方式制度化、参与范畴逐渐触及决策核心等特点,又以案例分析法从参与主体、客体、参与方式和制度环境方面对民间组织参与、地方政府制度创新参与、基层自治参与等实践机制进行了深入分析。文章认为,我国公民参与的实践机制已渐呈雏形,但鉴于协商民主自身的及公民参与的制度局限性,参与的广度、深度和效果难以维续和深入,对此,作者提出了构建公民参与网络的思路,要在各层次的公民参与中嵌入和补充商谈对话形式,充分发挥现有的民主协商、民主恳谈、民意沟通等方式传达民意的有效性,建立一个参与主体、参与方式、参与配套制度、参与空间、外部环境相互匹配和相互作用的参与网络,以拓展公民参与的范畴与深度,真正实现公民与政府对公共事务的良性共治。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the mid-1990s and from then on, the development of deliberative democracy arouses the introspection representative democracy and instrumental legitimacy, proposes the regression of democratic values such as self-governance, citizen participation and public benefits, etc, provides new conceptual and systematic support for the remodeling of legitimacy, and fits with the governance path and institutions that modern participation advocates. Therefore, It becomes the feasible way and inevitable direction of development of democratic politics to take deliberative democracy as the macro-political context, carry out in-depth research into the institutional intrinsic of deliberative democracy itself, achieve its convergence with the existing system, and promote the institution construction of citizen participation. The article makes a study of the democratic theory with a literature approach, carries out a comparative research on three stages of citizen participation, and modern citizen participation is characterized with organized participative subject, institutionized participative approach and expanded participative room which gradually touches the inner part of decision-making. Besides, taking classical cases as samples, this research analyzes the NGO participation mechanism, local government participation mechanism, self-governance participation mechanism from the perspective of participative object and subject, participative approaches and systematic environment. The study holds the opinion that the practical mechanism is still in the process of molding. However, the breadth, depth and effects of participation cannot develop and last in view of the limitation of deliberative democracy and participation. The author puts forward the idea of constructing the network of citizen participation, introducing deliberative channels, bringing the effectiveness of the existing democratic consultation into full play, in order to expand the scope and depth of participation, and realize virtuous cooperation and interaction between government and citizens in public affairs.更多还原