【作者】 袁晓东；

【导师】 戴艳军；

【作者基本信息】 大连理工大学 ， 马克思主义理论·思想政治教育， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 思想政治教育作为一门科学,其理论体系在长期的实践探索中不断丰富、发展。至今,已经形成了较为完备的学科基础理论和学科体系。但是,学科建设的任务是长期的和艰巨的,尤其是基本原理和基础理论建设还存在着极大的研究空间,随着时代的发展需要我们不断进一步研究和探索,思想政治教育本质问题就是其中之一。对这一问题的研究和回答,对于加深理解思想政治教育学科的特点和使命,提高学科理论对思想政治教育实践的指导作用具有重要意义。本文以思想政治教育这一特殊的教育实践活动为对象,运用文献分析、逻辑分析、比较分析、因素分析等研究方法,对关于思想政治教育本质进行界定的相关概念、相关理论、基本特征等方面进行了较为深入细致的分析。阐述了思想政治教育本质研究的理论意义与实践意义,剖析了关于思想政治教育本质研究现状及存在的问题,从哲学视角、历史视角和学科视角三个方面,考察了思想政治教育的源起及发展历程。通过对马克思主义关于人的本质理论、马克思主义的需要理论、马克思主义关于人的全面发展理论的探寻与梳理,揭示出思想政治教育本质的理论基础;从古今中外四个维度分析了思想政治教育的本源性发展进程;从思想政治教育学与政治学、教育学、伦理学、心理学、社会学、行为学的关系的视角,分析界定了与思想政治教育相关的本质研究理论。以上述研究为基础,从统治阶级实行国家统治的需要、社会维系与发展的需要、个人在社会中生存与发展的需要几个方面入手,提出了思想政治教育本质是满足国家、社会需要和个人需要的辩证统一,它具有政治性、科学性、实践性与导向性四个方面的特征。更多还原

【Abstract】 Ideological and political education (IPE), as a scientific discipline, has a long history of development in its theories, and, up to now, its theoretical system has become quite complete. However, with time passing by, the fundamental principles and primary theories need some further exploration in some aspects, one of which is the essence of IPE. The findings may lead to a better understanding of the features and missions of IPE and enhance the guidance of the theories for IPE practice.This paper researches on IPE’s essence by means of literature review, logic definition, comparison and factor analysis. It offers detailed analyses of its related comcepts, theoretical foundations and its features. It elaborates the theoretical and pragmatic significance of the investigation on IPE’s essence, reports its current situation and existing problems, and points out the new perspectives of the present study. It investigates the origin and development of IPE in terms of philosophy, history, and discipline. It summarizes the IPE’s theoretical foundations in terms of Marxist theories on human nature, human need, and comprehensive human development and reviews the developments of IPE’s essence from the four dimentions: past and present, home and abroad. By investigating the relations between IPE and such sciences as politics, education, ethics, sociology, and behavior, it defines essence, education and IPE, essence of education and essence of IPE, which are premises for the study on IPE’s essence. By analyzing the individual’s need to survivel and develop in society, the ruler’s need to govern the state, and the sociey’s need to sustain and develop, it draws the conclusion that IPE essence is dialectical unification of social needs and individual needs. It has four features: politicalism, scientificness, practicalism and directiveness.更多还原