浅析阿·敖德斯尔“人物为核心”的小说创作观

【作者】 海燕；

【导师】 额尔很巴雅尔；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 中国少数民族语言文学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 “人物为核心”的小说创作是作者界与评论界所普遍认可的,但还未见明确的说法。著名作家阿·敖德斯尔主张现实主义创作,注重生活—文学—接受主体的链条,提倡从生活中的人到作品中的人、再到读者心目中的人。本文阐述了阿·敖德斯尔的小说创作观,即小说人物源于生活,成长于作品,成熟于读者群的一种活动。全文由导论、正文(第一、第二、第三、第四章、小结)和附录等三个部分组成。第一章是论文的窗口。首先简述文学的入学研究现状,其次叙述蒙古族文学的文学人学(主要是作品中的人物研究)研究概况,与此同时探索作家阿·敖德斯尔的注重人物的原因。第二章,分析阿·敖德斯尔的“从生活中提取资本”的论点以及时代生活与民族生活的论述,阐明了人物源于生活的观点。第三章,分析阿·敖德斯尔的“人物引导情节”、环境服务于人物的观点,深入探究以“人物为核心”的小说创作观。第四章,解析阿·敖德斯尔的关于人物典型性的观点—“活性”,努力证明他的“人物为核心”的小说创作观。更多还原

【Abstract】 Novel writing centering on characters is generally recognized by writers and critics, although there is no clear theory on it. Well-known writer A Odser, who is a realist, focuses on life - literature - reader chain in novel creation, and promotes transforming the people in real life into characters in novel and figures in readers’ mind. This paper presents the view maintained by A Odser that a character in a novel should be born of real life, grow up in the work and be matured in readers’ mind.The paper is made up of three parts: Introduction, Text (Chapter I、II、III、IV、Conclusion) and Appendix.In chapter I, which is the eyes of the thesis, the author firstly introduces briefly the present situation of literature human science and then presents the research state of the human science of Mongolian literature (mainly the research of characters) while exploring the reasons why A Odser , the representative writer, attaches importance to characters.In chapter II, the author concludes that characters should come from a real life analyzing the argument of A Odser that materials should be extracted from the life as well as the one concerning life of times and nationality.In chapter III, an analysis has been made of the views of A Odser that characters lead the plots and environments serve characters in a novel in order to explore further his views of novel writing centering on characters.In chapter IV, an attempt has been made to prove A Odser’ s views of novel writing centering on characters through analyzing his opinion on typicality of character—flexibility.更多还原