【作者】 陈冰；

【导师】 吴国清；

【作者基本信息】 南京农业大学 ， 社会学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 转型期中国农村精英的研究是乡村研究领域的热门话题,但在众多成果中,鲜见对非治理精英的专题深入探讨。不同于治理精英来源于正式授权的权威,村庄非治理精英属于内生性权威,这种内生性权威来源于村落社会中的文化认同和利益联系。正是这种特殊性,本研究认为有必要深入考察村庄中非治理精英的构成以及他们在村庄发展中所起的作用。研究采用对个案村庄的深度描述方式,首先探讨非治理精英所体现的内生性权威的来源以及这一群体的类型、特征,接着通过以对村庄事件分析为主的形式探讨非治理精英在村庄发展中所发挥的作用及局限,最后对非治理精英与村庄发展的关系做出展望。非治理精英的存在和发挥作用是一定的村庄性质为前提的,因此个案村庄的社区记忆和性质是本研究分析的基础。调查发现,该村庄非治理精英可以分为经济精英、知识精英和社会精英三类,其中社会精英又包括退休老人、前任村干部和积极分子三种类型。总体上看,个案村庄的非治理精英具有复杂且具体的构成,他们是细小而琐碎的,却对该村由村政衰败的“空壳村”转型成一个有着内在发展动力和活力的“新农村建设示范点”起到了不可或缺作用,体现为“精英联合推动”。这种作用体现在促进村庄经济发展、实现公共物品有效供给以及参与村庄治理的过程中。同时在调查中也发现,非治理精英的作用发挥存在一定局限,表现在部分精英生活面向问题、自组织能力欠缺以及由于多种精英存在造成的整合难度提高。从村庄社区记忆和性质入手,为村民提供多种权威选择,整合村庄发展动力,形成内外结合的发展动力,对村庄的可持续发展是必要的。如何动员更多的非治理精英参与到村庄发展中,并克服上述种种局限,有待于村民自治制度乃至国家政治经济制度的进一步完善,以期臻于善治。更多还原

【Abstract】 Research of the rural elite of China in transformation period gradually becomes a hot issue in the rural research field. But, there is rare discussion of non-governance elite group in numerous achievements. Different from governance elite who is authorized formally, non-governance elite attributes endogenetic authority, which comes out of self-identity to mutual culture and interests’ bounding of village community. It is exactly this kind of particularity; this paper shows the necessary to investigate thoroughly non-governance elite’s structure and their functions played in the village development.This paper adopts a mode of in-depth description through survey of daily life and events in the case village. Firstly, the origin of endogenetic authority from non-governance elite’s inner-side and their types, characteristics of this group are discussed. The next part tries to probe into the non-governance elite’s functions and deficiencies in the village’s development through analyzing some important events. Finally, this paper prospects the relation between non-governance and the development of the village.The key of the non-governance ability lies in the existence of village community memory and character, which are the base of this research. This paper takes the main influence that non-governance elite possesses different preponderant resources as the standard, divides it into three kinds—economic elites, knowledge elites and social elites. Social elite includes retired old man, predecessor village cadre and activists. As the whole, the structure of the non-governance in the case village is intricate and idiographic. They are tiny and trifling, but play indispensable roles in the process of a declining ’empty shell village’ transit to an inner dynamic and energetic developing ’new countryside building demonstration pilot project’ in this case. This foundation can be named as ’the combined promotion of elite’, which reflects during the process of bringing about an advance in the village’s economy, realizing the effective supply of public goods and participating in the village administration. Some deficiencies are also emerging, such as non-governance’s life-facing, self-conducted organizing ability and the difficulty in conformity.It is essential that proceeding with the village community’s memory and character, offering multi-kind of authorities to the villagers to choose and combining the motive force of the villagers to realizing the sustainable development of the village. How to motivate more non-governance elite to participate in the village development and overcome all above-mentioned deficiencies, depend on a better villagers’ autonomy system, and even further completion of national political and economic systems innovation , and so to get the result of well-governing.更多还原