【作者】 周毅；

【导师】 李传印；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 专门史， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 本文在对李则纲1935年出版的史学理论著作——《史学通论》进行解读分析的基础上,对李则纲在该书中体现的史学思想进行初步归纳与总结。“绪言”部分主要对李则纲生平及其《史学通论》一书的出版背景、基本情况做一简单介绍,并说明本文的选题意义以及相关问题的研究现状。正文第一部分“李则纲关于历史学科基本问题的认识”。总结李则纲《史学通论》中的相关认识:一、李则纲从认识论角度去界定“历史”概念,将“历史”定义为是进入人类认识范围的历史客体,但在认识上亦有一定模糊之处;二、将“历史学”的基本关系确立为历史主体与历史客体之间的关系,并将史学理论也归入“历史学”的范畴之中;三、将历史学看着等同于自然科学,难脱实证主义史学之窠臼。正文第二部分是论述“李则刚的史学方法论”。李则纲受新史学思潮影响,史料视野宽阔,由于受实证主义史学“科学历史”观念影响,他能够打破史学与其他学科之间的封闭状态;李则纲在一定程度上接受了马克思主义经济史观,虽认识仍有些模糊,但他在学术范式的层面上来接受唯物史观和新史学中的合理因素,在一定程度上突破马克思主义史学史观派和新史学史料派这两大学术谱系之间的隔阂。此外,对李则纲在《史学通论》中提出的一些具体史学研究方法的阐述也是本部分重要内容之一。正文第三部分是论述“李则刚的历史教育思想”。在前两章论述的基础上,总结李则纲《史学通论》中的历史教育思想及与历史观的关系。李则纲在评判传统史学功能的基础上,强调史学为现实服务的功能,认为通过历史教育可以增进人们的科学精神,以及帮助人们树立正确的世界观。文章最后还总结了李则纲在《史学通论》中提出的一些历史教育方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Through the analysis of Li Zegang’s An Introduction to History about historical theory which was published in 1935, this thesis made a preliminary conclusion of its historiography thoughts.The preface mainly introduced all Li Zegang’s life and the publication background, meanwhile the fundamental situation of the book An Introduction to History. It also told us the significance of the subject as well as the present researches of the relevant matters.The first part of the body is“the acquaintance with the fundamental matters about History Subject”, It summarized some views relevant to Li Zegang’s An Introduction to History. Firstly, Li defined“history”as a historical narrative which enters into man’s acquainted domain in epistemology perspective, but with some vague points in the thought, Secondly, he established the fundamental relationship of“Science of History”as a relationship between history corpus and history object. And classified historical theory as“Science of History”, Thirdly, Li treated“Science of History”equal to natural science to make it hard to escape from Positivist Historiography.The second part of the body expounded upon Li Zegang’s“thoughts of historical methodology”, Influenced by new historiography current of thought; Li had an extensive perspective of historical materials. Besides, due to“Scientific History”perspective which comes form his positivist historiography, he could break up the close situation between science of history and other subjects. To some extent, Li Zegang accepted the economic history of Marxism. Although with vague acquaintance, he accepted the rational elements from historical materialism and new historiography at the academic mode level, and broke through the barrier between the historical Material School of Marxism historiography and the Textual Criticism School of the new historiography to some degree. Moreover, it also expounded some concrete methods of historical research. The third part of the body mainly expounded Li Zegang’s thoughts over historical education. It summations the thoughts on history education in Li’s An Introduction to History as well as the relation between his historical view and thoughts on history education on the basis of the arguments in the former two parts. Based on criticizing the traditional function of“science of history”, Li Zegang emphasized the function that the science of history serves the reality. In Li’s opinion, it was through history education that it could help people to enhance their science consciousness and establish a correct world view. Finally, it concludes some specific methods in history education that provided by Li Zegang in his An Introduction to History.更多还原