【作者】 闵鹏；

【导师】 张永红；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 刑法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 “飞车行抢”,应当是指行为人驾驶或乘坐能够高速行驶的交通工具,在其高速行驶的过程中,公然抢取他人随身携带的财物的行为。以交通工具为标准来划分,“飞车行抢”可分为驾乘机动车行抢的情形和驾乘非机动车行抢的情形;以行为的直接对象为标准来划分,“飞车行抢”可分为对物暴力的情形、对人暴力的情形以及由对物暴力转化为对人暴力的情形;以行为的数量为标准来划分,“飞车行抢”可分为单一行为“飞车行抢”的情形和复合行为“飞车行抢”的情形。关于“飞车行抢”行为的定性,理论上存在三种主要观点:抢夺说、抢劫说以及区分说。抢夺说和抢劫说都不符合“具体问题具体分析”的原则,因而不合理。区分说虽然具有一定的合理性,但是其根据和结论也存在不足之处。关于“飞车行抢”行为的定性之所以产生争议,主要有立法、理论、事实和社会等四个层面的原因。立法、事实和社会层面的原因都是客观的,无法改变,所以,理论问题的澄清是解决问题的关键。抢劫罪可以是单一行为犯。抢劫罪与抢夺罪的区别在于其行为方式是否具有人身强制或精神强制的性质。单一行为“飞车行抢”的情形中,如果其行为方式具有人身强制或精神强制的性质,应当成立抢劫罪;反之,应当成立抢夺罪,另外,如果造成了被害人重伤或死亡的后果,则应在抢夺罪和过失致人重伤罪、过失致人死亡罪中选择处罚较重的罪名定罪处罚,或者只能成立过失致人重伤罪或过失致人死亡罪。复合行为“飞车行抢”的情形应当成立抢劫罪。更多还原

【Abstract】 Motor-looting should refer to the act that people drive or travel with high-speed transport,openly rob the property of others in the process of its high-speed driving. Motor-looting can be divided into the motor vehicle occupants and non-motor vehicle occupants by the standard of transport division, it can be divided into the violence of the situation on the people ,the violence of the situation on the objects, and the situation of violence from objects into the people violence by the standards of object . It also can be divided into the single act and complex act by the standards of the number of perpetrator’s act.There are three main points in theory about the nature of motor-looting: the doctrine of snatch, the doctrine of robbery and the doctrine of distinction. Both the doctrine of snatch and the doctrine of robbery do not conform to the principle of concrete analysis for concrete problems, so they are unreasonable. Although there is good deal of reason in the doctrine of distinction, there are also deficiencies about its source and its conclusion. There are four reasons about the nature of motor-looting: the aspect of legislation, the aspect of theory, the aspect of fact and social dimension.The reasons of legislation, fact and social dimension are objective. They can not be changed. So the clarification of the issue is the key to solve the problem. Robbery can be a single-acted crime, the difference between the crime of robbery and snatch is whether there has been the physical force or the mental coercion. If there has been the nature of physical force or mental coercion, the behavior should be regarded as robbery conversely, it should be regarded as the crime of snatch. In addition, if it causes the consequences of serious injuries or death, it can be convicted and punished with a heavier penalty among the snatch crimes and the crime of serious injuries or death caused by negligence, or it can only be regarded as the crime of serious injuries caused by negligence, or the crime of death caused by negligence. The situation of motor-looting with complex acts should be regarded as robbery.更多还原