【作者】 张玲；

【导师】 范兴华；

【作者基本信息】 湖南科技大学 ， 课程与教学论， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 现阶段,人们在家庭社会经济地位上存在差异已成为一个客观现实,它给学生发展带来的影响引起了国内外研究者的关注。本研究采用问卷调查法,抽取衡阳市祁东县一中、郴州市宜章县一中和泪罗市区一中高一、高二两个年级共14班的学生作为研究对象,拟探讨家庭社会经济地位如何通过父母教养方式、学生问题行为对学生的同伴关系发生影响。本研究得到以下结论:1、与家庭社会经济地位较低的学生相比,家庭社会经济地位较高的学生知觉到的父母权威型教养方式较多,而知觉到的专制型、放任型教养方式较少。家庭社会经济地位的五个指标与权威型教养方式均呈显著正相关,除母亲职业以外,其它四个指标与放任教养方式均呈显著负相关。2、专制型教养与学习接纳、劳动接纳和接纳总分呈显著负相关,而与同伴拒斥的六个方面以及拒斥总分均呈显著正相关;放任型教养与学习接纳呈显著负相关。专制型教养对学习接纳、劳动接纳和接纳总分具有负向预测作用,而对同伴拒斥的六个方面以及拒斥总分具有正向预测作用。3、放任型教养和专制型教养与问题行为的四个因子均呈显著正相关,权威型教养与问题行为的四个因子均呈显著负相关。放任型教养对问题行为的四个因子和问题行为总分具有正向预测作用,专制型教养对违纪行为、欺骗行为和问题行为总分具有正向预测作用,权威型教养对欺骗行为和问题行为总分具有负向预测作用。4、问题行为的四个因子分别与同伴接纳的不同方面呈显著负相关,而与同伴拒斥的不同方面呈显著正相关。问题行为总分对学习接纳、劳动接纳具有负向预测作用,对学习拒斥、体育拒斥、课间拒斥、劳动拒斥具有正向预测作用;违纪行为对班团接纳具有负向预测作用,对班团拒斥、节假拒斥和拒斥总分具有正向预测作用;欺骗行为对接纳总分具有负向预测作用。5、家庭社会经济地位对父母权威教养方式具有直接正向作用,并通过权威教养负向预测学生的问题行为;同时家庭社会经济地位也通过影响父母权威教养方式、父母权威教养方式又影响学生问题行为而间接促进学生的同伴接受性。家庭社会经济地位对父母放任教养方式具有直接负向预测作用,但通过放任教养对学生问题行为的间接影响不显著;家庭社会经济地位对父母专制教养方式的影响系数不显著,因此它通过专制教养方式对学生总题行为的间接影响也不明显。学生的问题行为、父母的专制教养行为对学生的同伴接受性均具有直接负向作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 At the present stage, the differences of family’s social economic status exists as an objective fact, the relationship between family’s social economic status and student’s development draws a lot of attention from domestic and international researchers. In this research, we adopted questionnaires to study the influence of family’s social economic status on peer’s relationship by parenting style and students’ delinquent conduct. The research subjects are 14 classes’ students of Grade One and Grade Two from the First Senior High School of Qidong , Hengyang City, the First Senior High School of Yizhang, Chenzhou City, the First Senior High School of Miluo. The main results are as following:1. Compared with students of lower social economic status of family, the students of higher social economic status of family acknowledge more authoritative parenting, while less authoritarian and neglectful parenting. The five indexes of social economic status have remarkable positive correlation to authoritative parenting style. Other four indexes except mother’s job have negative correlation to neglectful parenting style.2. Authoritarian parenting style has respectively remarkable negative correlation to the score of study acceptance, labor acceptance and the total score of all kinds of acceptance. While it has respectively negative correlation to every type of rejection and the total score of all kinds of rejection. Neglectful parenting style has remarkable negative correlation to study acceptance. Authoritarian parenting style has negative prediction to the score of study acceptance, labor acceptance and the total score of all kinds of acceptance. While it has positive prediction to every type of rejection and the total score of all kinds of rejection.3. Neglectful parenting style and authoritarian parenting style have remarkable positive correlation to the four indexes of delinquent conduct, authoritative parenting style has remarkable negative correlation to the four indexes of delinquent conduct. Neglectful parenting style has positive prediction to the four indexes of delinquent conduct and the total score of all kinds of delinquent conduct. Authoritarian parenting style has positive prediction to disobey conduct, cheating conduct and the total score of all kinds of delinquent conduct. Authoritative parenting style has negative prediction to cheating conduct and the total score of all kinds of delinquent conduct.4. The four indexes of delinquent conduct respectively have remarkable negative correlation to different factors of peer acceptance while remarkable positive correlation to different factors of peer rejection. The total score of delinquent conduct has negative prediction to study acceptance and labor acceptance while positive prediction to study rejection, interim break rejection and labor rejection. Disobey conduct has negative prediction to class acceptance while positive prediction to class rejection, vacation rejection and total score of all kinds of rejection. Cheating conduct has negative prediction to total score of all kinds of acceptance.5. Family’s social economic status has direct positive influence on authoritative parenting, through which negatively predicting students’ delinquent conduct. Meanwhile it has influence on authoritative parenting type. And authoritative parenting type has influence on students’ delinquent conduct so as to promote peer’s acceptance.Family’s social economic status has direct negative prediction to neglectful parenting, but neglectful parenting doesn’t has remarkable influence on students’ delinquent conduct. And family’s social economic status doesn’t has remarkable correlation to authoritarian parenting. So it doesn’t have remarkable indirect influence on students’ delinquent conduct through authoritarian parenting.Students’ delinquent conduct and parents’ authoritarian parenting conduct have direct negative influence on peer’s acceptance.更多还原