《列子》研究三题

【作者】 李俊；

【导师】 徐克谦；

【作者基本信息】 南京师范大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 《列子》是一部重要的道家典籍,西汉末年由刘向校定,即《汉书·艺文志》著录为八篇。论文第一章全面总结了二十世纪有关《列子》研究状况。首先,辨伪是《列子》研究史中最重要的内容,因此作者不仅描述了辨伪发展的阶段,还归纳出前人最重要的两个研究角度:语言和重文比勘。作者发现这两个角度并非尽善尽美,限制条件很多,使用者们应该谨慎。其次,就《列子》思想研究状况作了总结。思想研究大致可分为三个阶段,具有两个特征。这两个特征分别是:其一是抽绎《列子》本身的内涵;其二是研究此书在哲学史上的意义。最后,本论文还概述了文学、语言等相关研究情况,指出这方面研究的不足及其原因。在第二章中,作者考辨了三个颇为重要的问题。第一,《列子新书》的概貌。作者主要结合刘向《列子叙录》和今本《列子》所提供的信息,参互钩稽,考订出《列子新书》的轮廓。第二,张湛重编《列子》。《列子》非张湛伪作,由于社会动乱,《列子》散佚,他只是重编此书并为之作了注解而已。本文重点考辨了张湛重编《列子》的诸多证据及其凡例。第三,唐宋间《列子》的版本。作者详细考察了《列子释文》中的异文,通过与现存北宋本比较,发现此书所辑录《列子》异文的所显示的版本信息更早,而且至少参考了三种不同的本子,显现了唐宋之际《列子》流传的概貌,从而廓清了前人认为《列子释文》晚于北宋本的观点。论文的第三章主要考辨的是历史上四种具有代表性的《列子》文学风格论。作者不仅分析了这些观点的内涵及其形成的原因,还论述了它们之间的相互关系,并予以适当的评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 "Liezi" is an important classic Taoist works, which was compiled by Liu Xiang in the later Western Han Dynasty, with eight volumes recorded in "Hanshu·Yiwenzhi".This thesis consists of three parts: the first part a general survey and comments of the study of Liezi in the 20^th century; the second part, discussing some textual authenticity issues of the book; the third part, commentary on some typical criticism on Liezi’s literature style in the history.In the 20^th century, authenticity is the most important part in "Liezi" study’s history. The author not only describes the development of the distinguishing stage predecessors but also sums up the two most important approaches in research perspective: language and recomposition. The author found that the two approaches are not perfect, which were limited by many conditions, and the researchers should be cautious in using them. The author also divides the study of Liezi in the 20^th century into three stages, which have two features: one is consentrated on the connotation and characters of the book "Liezi" and the other is on the statue of the book in the history of philosophy. In the final section of this part, the author provides an overview of literature and language-related research, and points out the inadequate in these research. At the end, the author also gives an overview of the overseas "Liezi" Research.In the second chapter, the author discusses three important issues related to the textual issue of Liezi. First, what is the situation of "Liezi Xinshu", which has seldom be studied by previous scholars. Based on the comparasion between the information provided by Liu xiang in his Liezi’s Preface and the current text of "Liezi", the author drafts out a basic framework of the book "Liezi Xinshu". Second, Zhang zhan reedited rather than forged the book of "Liezi". Since Liezi was spreading and circulating in the Western Jin Dynasty Zhang zhan was not, and could not be a falsifier. He is only collected different versions of the book, reedited it and added his own commentaries. The author thus try to figure out what is the rules and regulations Zhang zhan had used when reediting it. Third, regarding the "Liezi" versions in Tang and Song Dynasty, and find that some of the divergent text in this book compiled even earlier than any other versions, and had referenced at lest three different versions.The third part mainly discussed four typical critiques of Liezi’s literary style in the history. The author not only discussed the connotation and the formation of such understandings, but also describes their relations and gives appropriate evaluation.更多还原