【作者】 胡艳；

【导师】 叶平；

【作者基本信息】 河南大学 ， 中国哲学史， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 西方哲学的研究范式经历了三次重大的转向:本体论转向、认识论转向和语言学转向。而第三次转向语言学转向是由维特根斯坦发起的,维特根斯坦在他的著作《逻辑哲学论》中明确指出:语言可以表达能够言说的东西,对于不可言说的东西,我们必须保持沉默。因此,维特根斯坦的后期语言哲学也转向了日常语言的研究。而在两千多年前,一位中国古代哲人庄子,也对这个不可言说的问题进行了关注,也试图克服语言的困境。就在这个问题上,中西方哲学有着惊人的相似。本篇文章以二人言说方式的比较作为切入点,试图分析其背后深层次的哲学根源。对于不可言说之域,庄子和维特根斯坦都进行了密切的关注,而对于不可言说之域如何去言说,二者的解决方案显然不同。维特根斯坦认为应该保持沉默,而庄子提出的解决方案有两种:一、保持沉默;二、变科学的、逻辑的说为诗性的、隐喻的说。我认为二者差异的最终原因是由思维方式的不同造成的,同时也是由不同的文化背景和文化心理造成的。这在各章各节会有详尽地论述。全文主体分为五个章节:首先通过绪论引出问题,也就是哲学问题提出的合理性。接着介绍了维特根斯坦言说方式的特点和庄子言说方式的特点,最后对二者不同的根源进行哲学层面的分析。更多还原

【Abstract】 The study of Western Philosophy experienced three great diversions: ontological diversion、epistemological diversion and philologic diversion. The third diversion was put forward by Ludwing Wittgenstein. He pointed definitely in his book that languang could express something that they could exprss.For those things that could not be expressed,we must keep silence. So his later language philosiphy turned to studying daily language.But two thousand years ago, a Chinese philosopher named Zhuangzi,also noticed this question ,and he also conquered predicament of language.For this question Chinses Philosophy was so similar to Western Philosophy.This paper starts with the contrast of their speaking quomodo, trying to analyse the deep-seated cause of their distinctness.IN this field that it could not be spoken,They all noticed it definitely, but how to speak out Something which could not be spoken. The solutions of this problem ware different. Wittgenstein deemed we should keep silence;but Zhuangzi thought there were two solutions to settle this problem:one was to keep silence,the other was to change speaking method.changed logical speaking to poetic speaking.I think the difference of the two philosophers is their difference thingking,it is also caused by their different cultural background and their different mental culture.I would discuss them in chapters and nodulus.This paper is divided into five parts:First,the problem is elicited in preface,it tells us the philosophy problem was reasonable. Sequentially,introduced their speaking characters respectively and at last analysed their difference from philosophy.更多还原