节点文献

论日本反垄断法上的法律责任制度及其借鉴

The Liability of Japanese Anti-Monopoly Law and the Enlightenment

【作者】 邱阳

【导师】 肖江平;

【作者基本信息】 北京大学 , 经济法学, 2008, 硕士

【副题名】以“课征金”征缴制度为例

【摘要】 反垄断法上的法律责任制度是反垄断法的重要组成部分,对保障、促进反垄断法的实施意义重大。研究反垄断法上的法律责任问题,不仅有重要的理论价值,也具有重要的实践意义。我国《反垄断法》刚出台不久,对法律责任的规定尚存诸多不足。因此,必须借鉴其他国家和地区的立法经验,引入国外先进的立法理念和立法技术对其进行完善。然而世界各国(地区)反垄断法上的法律责任制度存在较大差异,这就要求在进行法律移植的时候,必须选择合适的法律移植对象。日本和中国在社会经济发展历程上、历史和文化传统上有很多的共性。日本的《禁止垄断法》①从制定至今,经历了从全盘照搬到逐渐融入本国土壤的过程。日本的竞争法制己经解决和正在解决的问题,以及今后的发展趋势,可以为我国反垄断法的实施和完善提供十分丰富的参考。基于此,本文从反垄断法上法律责任制度的基本理论入手,以日本《禁止垄断法》上的课征金征缴制度为例,通过对日本《禁止垄断法》上法律责任制度的选择及变迁的相关系统研究,分析其中的经验和不足,以获取合理构建我国反垄断法上的法律责任制度的借鉴。

【Abstract】 Since the liability in Anti-Monopoly Law can help to ensure the law’s function, they are crucial parts in such law. Thus, researches on the liability may not only bring innovation in theories of Anti-Monopoly Law, but also guide practice in such field. Because the Anti-monopoly Law of China has just been promulgated, its enactments on the liability have several defects and should be improved according to the experience of developed countries. The liability of Anti-Monopoly Law around the world is different in many aspects, which make us to choose the right transplant object.Japanese Anti-monopoly Act was once a simple transplant of the foreign rules, and was then amended to adapt to the unique circumstances of Japan. And these amendments were successful, which contribute a lot to the development of the society. China is as similar as to Japan on the common ground. So this paper begins from the basic theory of liability, and discourses the surcharge system in Japanese Anti-monopoly Act, then researches the liability in Japanese Anti-monopoly Act systematically. From this, we want to get some useful enlightenment in the liability of Chinese Anti-monopoly law, and could make the liability system be integrated and the Chinese Anti-monopoly law be better enforced.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 北京大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2008年 08期
  • 【分类号】DD912.29;D931.3
  • 【被引频次】8
  • 【下载频次】786
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络