刑事案件审理负担实证研究

【作者】 李刚；

【导师】 左卫民；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 作者以中国西部一个基层法院为调查对象，作者以法律实证研究方法为研究基础，通过收集、整理该法院1990年—2004年刑事案件数量与司法审判资源相关的数据，以及法院内部管理制度在实践中的运作情况，析这些因素与刑事案件审理负担的关系以及我国基层法院法官刑事案件审理负担的实际情况。在引言中作者反思了中国传统法学的研究范式，提出了在法律移植与中国社会转型的前提下，第一章，作者分析了本课题的研究价值、研究视角以及研究方法。第二章，作者介绍了N县法院1990—2005年刑事案件受理数量、审理数量的变化情况，并分析了导致这一变化的基本原因。第三章，作者分析了与1990—2005年N县刑事审判法官人数变化情况、基层法院在日常工作中如何应对刑事案件数量的变化、N县法院办公条件变化以及在司法实践中实行的院、庭长案件把关制度与审判长选任制度和书记员管理制度等与刑事案件审理负担相关的法院内部管理制度等因素，得出了N县刑事审判体系扩大化的结论。结语中，作者通过对实证材料的分析，得出了影响法院刑事案件审理负担的真正因素是能动性的国家权力属性及其对社会的控制的需求。附件列举了作者在实地调研过程中所收集到的与N县基层法院刑事案件审理负担相关的数据和资料。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper’s survey is a grassroots court in western China. The author’s study basis on legal empirical research method. Through collecting the criminal court in 1990, finishing 2004 with the number of cases relating to the judicial resources and the court’s internal management system in practice the operation of the use of state power as a scientific theoretical foundation-level, Analysis of these factors and the relationship between the burden of a criminal trial courts, and our judges hearing criminal cases the burden of the actual situation.In the introduction to the study authors reflect on the paradigm of traditional Chinese law. the transplant and China’s social transformation in the law under the premise of the first chapter, the authors analyzed the subject of research value Perspective and research methods.The second chapter, the authors introduced the N County Court 1990-2005, the number of criminal cases handled. changes in the number of trial, and analysis of the underlying causes that led to this change. The third chapter, the authors analyzed the 1990-2005 N and the number of changes in the county criminal judge, Grassroots courts in the day-to-day work on how to deal with changes in the number of criminal cases. N, and changes in working conditions in the county court’s judicial practice center President screening system and the chief justice system and case management system clerk burden associated with the criminal case to be heard within the court Department management system, the county criminal justice system magnifies N drawn conclusions.In conclusion, the author’s analysis of empirical evidence. Come to the court’s hearing of a criminal case the burden is really on the initiative of state power and social attributes of control demand. Annex cited by the authors collected in the course of the field investigation and trial of criminal cases N county courts at the grassroots level have the burden associated data and information.更多还原