【作者】 李勇；

【导师】 魏东；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 法律， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 对文明的追求和对人权的尊重日益凸现，废减死刑成为了当今世界人们关注的一个焦点。联系美国“9．11”、约旦“11．9”等恐怖事件看，对暴力性犯罪死刑的废减已受严重挑战，但对涉及经济的非暴力性犯罪特别是贪污贿赂罪死刑的废减还争议颇多。本文为寻求一个理性的结论，对中国一些学者、官员及人大代表力主废减贪污贿赂罪死刑的观点提出置疑。一方面从理论的角度探寻法理支撑，对与死刑相关的法、犯罪、人权及刑罚等基本法理进行再认识，得出贪污贿赂犯罪由于严重侵犯了法益，必然要受到刑罚处罚，衡量罪与非罪和应受何种处罚的标准，在于犯罪本身社会危害性的大小，不在于使用暴力、涉及经济利益与否，同时，人权不能脱离客观现实而存在，不能绝对化，对犯罪人人权的限制剥夺程度，标准也在犯罪的社会危害程度，在于能否通过刑罚处罚来达到制法目的和刑罚目的，不在于其它因素，从而从法理上推出死刑针对的是社会危害极为严重的犯罪，具有存在的合理性，实质上与尊重保护人权并不矛盾。另一方面从实践的角度探讨废减的可能性，指明贪污贿赂罪的严重社会危害，并结合中国国情实际，从经济、政治、法律等角度进行分析，通过对“死刑无用论”、“不尊重人权论”、“国家利益论”等当前一些主流废减观点的辩驳、探究和反思，得出我国目前不应也不能废减贪污贿赂罪死刑的结论，指明现在废减该类犯罪死刑的危害极大。进而，联系执政党的发展观和北欧一些国家成功废除该类犯罪死刑的经验，理性地分析我国贪污贿赂罪死刑政策的完善与发展，提出目前和今后对该类犯罪死刑应贯彻的原则，即目前的“不废减要慎用”原则和今后的“具前提方废减”原则。更多还原

【Abstract】 With more and more importance attached to aspiration to civilization and respect for human rights, the abolition and reduction of death penalty has become a worldwide focus nowadays. Since many terrorism affairs happened throughout the world such as "9.11" in the U.S and "11.9" in Jordan, many people have doubted the feasibility to abolish and reduce death penalty for violence. But there are still different opinions about death penalty for nonviolent crime concerning economy, bribe and corruption in particular. In China, some scholars, officials and representatives of CPC advocate that the death penalty for bribe and corruption should also be abolished. For a rational conclusion, this thesis challenges their points. On one hand, from academic angle, analyzing some basic juristic concepts such as law, crime, human rights, penalty and so on, the thesis puts forward that bribe and corruption should be punished inevitably because it violate the people’s legal interests greatly. We should judge crime or innocence and its corresponding penalty by it harmfulness to our society, but not by whether it’s violent or it has endangered the economy. Meanwhile, human rights can’t be separated from reality and can be too extreme. The degree of deprivation and confinement of criminal’s human rights is decided by the danger degree of the crime. So the thesis concludes that it’s reasonable to reserve death penalty and virtually it doesn’t contradict with respect of human rights. On the other hand, from the practical angle, relating to the real situation in China, the thesis draws the conclusion that China shouldn’t and couldn’t abolish and reduce the death penalty. The author hold a negative attitude to some mainstream points such as "death penalty has no use", "it violates human rights" and "for national benefits". It expounds that bribe and corruption has endangered our society seriously. Furthermore, relating to the developing point of the party in power and the successful experience in some countries in North Europe, to perfect the policy for China, the author advocates two principles, that is, "not abolish and reduce the death penalty but use it cautiously" and "not abolish and reduce the death penalty until conditions permit".更多还原