【作者】 朱娟；

【导师】 骆明弟；

【作者基本信息】 广西师范大学 ， 语言学及应用语言学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 语气副词“反而”、“却”的用法既有区别又有相似之处,这些区别和相似之处是什么?迄今尚未发现有专文对此作过深入研究。本文针对本体研究现状的不足以及留学生使用两者所出现的偏误,将“反而”与“却”放在一起进行对照研究,从语义分析出发,找出其语义上的对立点,在此基础上探讨由其语义决定了的句法、语用和篇章方面的异同。本文共分四个部分。第一部分为“引言”部分。本部分介绍本文选题缘由、研究价值、研究现状及存在的不足、研究的方法和思路等。第二部分为“‘反而’与‘却’的语义分析”部分。本部分首先回顾并剖析前人对于“反而”和“却”意义的研究,然后分别从“反而”与“却”转折前后项的语义关系、语境进行对比分析,概括出两者在语义上的差别为:第一,“反而”侧重于反,即反常理;而“却”更侧重于转,重在强调情况变异。第二,“反而”具有预示功能,“却”不具备此种功能。第三,“反而”带有的主观性比“却”相对较强。第三部分为“‘反而’与‘却’语用、篇章分析”部分。本部分联系“反而”和“却”的语义异同,分别探讨两者在句中表达语气、与其他词语的搭配、篇章功能及衔接方式等四个方面。认为在语气表达上,由于它们都表转折语气,但“反而”比“却”所表的转折语气更强;在与其他词语的搭配上也不尽相同;在篇章功能上,两者都具有篇章连接功能,但“反而”有表示矛盾性转折、反递性转折两种功能,“却”有表逆转、递进两种篇章功能;在篇章衔接方式上,“反而”在语篇中位序比较灵活,有句中和句首两种,“却”在语篇中的典型衔接方式为句中,既可以位于主语后,谓语前,还可以连接句中两个结构成分。第四部分为留学生“反而”、“却”语句的偏误分析部分。本部分运用前面的研究结论分析留学生的一些相关偏误。更多还原

【Abstract】 There are both similarity and differences in the usage of the Modal Adverb“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”.What are they?Up to date no papers on this issue are available.This paper discusses it . This text Aim at the shortage of student abroads of the essence research present condition use both appear of be partial to the mistake, will put“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”.together to carry on checking against the research, set out from the Semantics analysis, find out its difference of the Semantics, explore to beg for in this foundation from its language righteousness come to a decision of sentence construction, language use and the different and similar of the literary piece.This thesis includes four parts.The first part is foreword. This part introduces the reason of this thesis, research value, the research present condition and existent of shortage, research of the method and way of thinking etc.The second part is“the Semantics analysis on‘Fan er’and‘Que’”. In this part ,we firstly analyze the study abour the grammatic meaning of“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”made by people before,then difference from“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”.turn in front and back the language righteousness of the item relation, the language environment carries on the contrast analysis, generalizing both at the difference of the language righteousness is:The first, be lay particular emphasis on in“Fan er(反而)”anti-, namely abnormal reason;But“Que (却)”even be lay particular emphasis on in to turn, heavy at emphasize the circumstance variation.The second, have the function of indicate“Fan er(反而)”,“Que(却)”don’t have the this kind function.The third, take the subjective for have to compare“Fan er(反而)”“Que(却)”opposite stronger.The third part for“the Pragmatics and literary piece analysis of’Fan er(反而)’and‘Que(却)’" part.This part contact“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”of the language righteousness different and similar, inquiry into both to express the tone, match with other phrase languages in the sentence respectively, the literary piece function and link up the way etc. four aspect.Think to express in the tone up, because they all the watch turn tone, but compare“Fan er(反而)”" is stronger the turn tone of the form;At match with other phrase languages up also not exhausted homology;On the literary piece function, both all have the literary piece conjunction function, but“Fan er(反而)”mean the self-contradict sex turn, anti- pass two kinds of functions of sex turn,"" have the form to converse, pass into two kinds of literary piece functions;Link up the way in the literary piece up,“Fan er(反而)”in the language article a preface is more vivid, having the sentence to moderate a two kinds of,“Que(却)”in the language article of typical model link up the way for in the sentence, since can locate the main language after, before calling the language, can also link two structure compositions in sentence.The fourth part is divided into the student abroad“Fan er(反而)”and“Que(却)”lexical be partial to the mistake analysis part.The research conclusion of this part of usages front analytical student abroad of some related be partial to the mistake.更多还原