【作者】 何玫莉；

【导师】 周长军；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 刑法学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 法官定罪裁量权是刑事裁量权的重要组成部分。在定罪裁量权的概念、适用界域、影响因素以及规制措施等问题上，学界缺少应有的重视和研究。本文试图从上述几个方面入手，对定罪裁量权进行尝试性的研究和探索，以求抛砖引玉。本文分为五个部分。第一章是定罪裁量权的概述。对“定罪裁量权”的概念界定的关键是对“定罪”的理解。如果把定罪看成出罪和入罪的统一过程的话，则定罪主体有三个，相应的，定罪裁量权的主体也有三个：法官、检察官、警察——当然，在英美法系还包括陪审团。本文仅限于从法官的视角加以研究。定罪裁量权存在之必要性可以从以下几个方面得以阐释：规范性构成要件、开放性构成要件的存在，为定罪裁量权提供了生存空间：法条的模糊性使法官在适用法律审理个案时不得不对其加以解释；即便是同一条文，不同的法官在不同时期也会有不同的理解。定罪裁量权与罪刑法定原则并非必然冲突，前者是对后者的“柔化”。第二章是定罪裁量权的适用界域。大体而言，法官定罪裁量权主要适用于以下几个环节：事实认定过程中、“找法”过程中、认定事实与找法活动完成之后的裁量。第三章是影响定罪裁量权行使的因素。笔者把这些因素分为三类：一类是正式制度因素——犯罪构成；一类是以习惯法、民意为代表的非正式制度因素；还有一类是制度外因素，即法官个体因素。第四章是法官定罪裁量权行使的合理规制。定罪裁量权不能超过一定的限度，否则就属于定罪裁量权的滥用，这势必会造成司法不公之后果。笔者认为，可以从三个方面入手对法官定罪裁量权进行合理规制。其一，从软性的定罪思维方式入手进行规制；其二，从硬性的程序性机制入手进行规制；其三，从定罪裁量主体的个体素质入手进行规制。更多还原

【Abstract】 Discretion in proceeding of conviction is one of the important components in discretion in criminal proceedings. There is a shortage in the study about discretion in proceeding of conviction, such as its concept, boundary region, influencing factors and regulation .And the author is going to engaged in the problems above.This article contains five parts: The first part is the summary of discretion in proceeding of conviction. And this part contains these contents below: the concept of discretion in proceeding of conviction; the argument about the value of the being of discretion in proceeding of conviction; the practical action of discretion in proceeding of conviction; the relationship between discretion in proceeding of conviction and the principle of legality. The second part is the boundary region of discretion in proceeding of conviction. During the proceeding of conviction, discretion of the judge is usually seen., For example, when recognizing facts, and finding the corresponding legal, and so on. The third part is about the influencing factors of discretion in proceeding of conviction. The author divides these factors into three kinds: factors of formal system; factors of informal system; factors outside system. The fourth part is about the regulation of discretion in proceeding of conviction. We can regulate discretion in proceeding of conviction from the following aspects: the thinking mode of conviction; the procedure mechanism; the individual quality of the bodies of conviction.更多还原