【作者】 张旭东；

【导师】 黄珅；

【作者基本信息】 华东师范大学 ， 古代文学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 李商隐和杜牧是晚唐两位杰出的诗人，李商隐有两首诗赠杜牧，但杜牧没有回应。这里固然有种种可能性，但在万千可能性之外，不排除一种可能，那就是杜牧有意不予回应。本文第一部分从两首赠诗、事关刘黄、事关元白三个方面略加考索。他们之间友谊的存在与否，都丝毫不影响二人在文学史上的地位。实事求是地分析他们的差异，有助于研究的深入。本文第二部分从性格、成长环境、思想、党争影响和文学观等五个角度，分析二人的不同。“李赠而杜不答”应该令我们想到在杜牧与元、白的公案后面，还可能存在着杜牧与李商隐的一场潜对话，我们认为对话的中心围绕的是爱情诗。李商隐的外甥韩偓将自己的爱情诗都为一集，并亲自作序，介入到这场“潜对话”中来。杜牧这方所持观点是对文学政教功能的再强调，李商隐与韩偓则以行动反驳。联系钱钟书在《宋诗选注序》中所提到的“宋朝爱情诗的缺失”这个问题，这场“潜对话”具有明显的学案性质，值得深入研究。本文第三部分就对韩偓与李商隐的继承关系、韩偓对潜对话的介入、以及潜对话的学案性质等几个方面略加梳理。总之，本文尝试通过考辨小李杜之间的交谊来还原晚唐存在过的那次带有学案性质的对话并探寻它的文学史意义。更多还原

【Abstract】 Both Li Shang-yin and Du Mu are well-known poets of late Tang Dynasty. Once Li Shang-yin gave his two poems to Du Mu but the latter didn’t give his ones back to the former. The reason, although there were many other occasional factors, was about the two poems itselves, Liu Fen, Yuan Zhen and Bai Ju-yi.But the fact that they are no friends doesn’t influence their literature fames. It is necessary to make an approach to there different positions. The second part of this paper tells the differences between the two poets from the political position, literal view, growing back, the fighting of parties and individual character.The last part of the paper is the discussion that there were a dialogue between Du Mu and Li Shang-yin. The key point about the dialogue is the poems of love. Han Wo, the nephew of Li Shang-yin, took part in the dialogue by collecting his love poems together as Xiang Lian Ji and writing a preface by himself. Contacting Ms. Qian Zhong-shu’ judgment that there were few love pomes in Song Dynasty, the dialogue had a nature of the learning case. The third part of the article studies the inheriting relationship, Han Wo’s intervention and the learning case nature of the dialogue.In brief, this article is attempting to reappear the dialogue of late Tang Dynasty by inspecting the friendship of Du Mu and Li Shang-yin.更多还原