【作者】 吴秉坤；

【导师】 方朝晖；

【作者基本信息】 清华大学 ， 专门史， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 《左传》是一部充满争议的古代典籍,历代学者围绕着《左传》的作者、写作时代及其与《春秋》的关系等问题展开争论,时至今日也无法达成共识。在这些争论中有一个比较重要的问题是《左传》叙事与解经义例之间的关系。坚持《左传》传经性质的学者强调二者的相辅相成,坚持《左传》原是独立史书的学者则认为义例为后人所添加。本文抛开门户之见,承认《左传》叙事对于解释《春秋》的重要意义,同时又通过大量的案例分析,指出《左传》叙事与弑君凡例之间存在一种紧张关系,从而说明《左传》叙事与解经义例之间确实存在不相吻合的情况。至于这种张力产生的原因,人们可以做出各种解释,本文从叙事的自身特点出发,认为叙事在解经的同时还表达了叙事者的自身思想,这可能是导致张力产生的一个原因。更多还原

【Abstract】 ZuoZhuan is a controversial ancient book. The past and latest scholars have had great disputes and disagreements on issues concerning who the author was, when it was completed and its relation with ChunQiu, etc.An important issue of these disputes is the relation between the narration and interpretation in ZuoZhuan. Scholars who insist that ZuoZhuan is an interpretation of ChunQiu emphasize the relation of cooperation between them. Scholars who insist that ZuoZhuan was an unique historical book point out that it is not cooperative between them and the interpretation in ZuoZhuan must come out of later hands.This paper does not want to show preference to any of them. We agree that the narration of ZuoZhuan is very important to explain ChunQiu, but with many case analyses we discover that there is a tense relation between the narration and the interpretation about murdering monarch in ZuoZhuan. This proves that it is really not very cooperative between the narration and the interpretation in ZuoZhuan. There are different answers to explain this tense relation. We think it may be a very important reason that the narration can express the ideas of the narrator exclude of the interpretation due to characteristics of itself.更多还原