节点文献

试析我国的科学不端行为

The Research on the Scientific Misconduct of Our Country

【作者】 石玮

【导师】 孙毅霖;

【作者基本信息】 上海交通大学 , 科学技术哲学, 2007, 硕士

【摘要】 “不端行为”按字面上的解释是“不正派”和“不好”的行为。“科学不端行为”概而言之,就是“发生在科学研究领域的不正派或不好的行为”。近年来“黄禹锡事件”和“汉芯事件”等科学不端行为已成为阻碍科学技术进步、败坏学术界形象的社会热点问题,人们通过各种媒体对发生在身边等科学不端行为进行了披露。我国不少学者对其作了分析和研究,但大部分学者都把焦点放在了科学道德的建设和学术规范的制定上,缺乏一个较全面的定性分析和建设性的建议措施。本文采用文献研究、个案分析归纳与表格对比相结合的方法,对科学不端行为的定义、种类、发现模式、产生的社会根源和防范惩治科学不端行为的对策等问题展开研究。主要成果如下:首先,在全面收集整理我国改革开放以来发生过的诸多科学不端行为事件的基础上,按其行为特征对科学不端行为进行归纳分类和定性分析,采用理论分析加举例的方法重点介绍了捏造、篡改、剽窃、对已经取得的成果采取不符合实际的作者署名和一稿两投或多投这五种主要的

【Abstract】 Misconduct in science has obstructed the development of science and technology and uglified the image of academia. In our country a lot of scholars did some analysis and research on the scientific misconduct, most of which focused on the construction of scientific morality and the establishment of academic norm and lacked a comprehensive qualitative analysis and some feasible and enlightening advice.This paper does some research on the definition, types, discovery patterns, social sources of the scientific misconducts and the methods of preventing and punishing with the methods of document research, case analysis and table comparison.The results of this research are as follows:Firstly, on a basis of case research, the scientific misconducts have been classified into five main types: a. fabrication, b. falsification, c. plagiarism, d. signature which is not in accord with the facts, e. contribution to different magazines with the same paper. The author also makes a qualitative analysis

  • 【分类号】G311
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】773
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络