【作者】 梁媛；

【导师】 张榕；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 民商法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 在近年的民事司法改革中,民事诉讼证据制度的完善一直备受关注,证据交换制度是民事诉讼证据制度的一项重要内容,我国民事诉讼法中并没有关于证据交换的相关规定,但在最高人民法院2001年12月21日颁布的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《民事诉讼证据规定》)中确立了该项规则。证据交换制度的建立,对于完善民事审判程序具有重要的意义,但《民事诉讼证据规定》中对证据交换的规定比较简陋,相关的理论研究也不够深入,本文拟对该制度进行研究,并对该制度的完善提出立法建议。本文除引言和结语外,分为四章。第一章从证据交换制度的含义出发,追溯证据交换制度的起源,指出证据交换制度是为了解决证据突袭、诉讼拖延、效率低下、费用高昂等问题所作的一种制度设计,从而得出确立证据交换制度的价值取向就在于实现诉讼公正,克服诉讼拖延,减少诉讼成本,促进和解。该章也对证据交换制度的类型作简要介绍。第二章考察外国的证据交换制度,并对英美法系和大陆法系的证据交换模式作一简要评析,指出两种证据交换模式目前出现了相互借鉴和逐渐融合的趋势。第三章回顾我国有关证据交换的立法历程,分析《民事诉讼证据规定》对证据交换的规定,并与外国的证据交换制度进行比较,指出我国证据交换制度的缺陷在于效力层次低、缺乏强制性和权威性;原则性规定多,可操作性不强;且缺乏相应的配套制度。第四章提出通过修改民事诉讼法或制定专门的证据法,将证据交换制度的效力上升到法律的层次。并针对前述我国证据交换制度的缺陷,提出我国证据交换制度应定位为以当事人主义为主,以职权主义为辅的模式,从主持证据交换的主体、证据交换的适用范围、时间、方式、次数和操作规程等方面提出完更多还原

【Abstract】 The consummating of civil litigation evidence system has always been the focused issue during the recent civil justice reform in China, of which the evidence exchange system is of importance. In fact, there is no relevant regulations among China’s civil litigation laws. The Highest People’s Court promulgated the Relevant Regulations on Civil Litigation Evidence (hereafter as the Regulations on Civil Litigation Evidence) on December 21, 2001, establishing the evidence exchange system to further implement the civil justice procedures. Nevertheless, the Regulations on Civil Litigation Evidence are comparatively simple and brief. Basing on this, the thesis intends to research on this subject and provides suggestions on legislation of evidence exchange system. The thesis has been incorporated by 6 parts, including preface, four chapters and epilogue.Chapter one clarifies the definition of the evidence exchange system and explores its origin. The system is designed to counterattack evidence sudden attack, litigation delay, low efficiency, high cost etc. Therefore the value orientation of establishing evidence exchange system is to realize litigation justice, overcome litigation delay, reduce litigation cost and accelerate settlement. Besides, the chapter briefly introduces the category of evidence exchange system.Mainly introducing the evidence exchange systems in foreign countries, Chapter two analyzes the respective modes of Anglo-American law system and continental law system. The author further pointed out that the two prominent modes of evidence exchange revealed the trend of mutual-reference and gradual reconciliation.Chapter three recalls the legislation process of evidence exchange in China, analyzing the Regulations on Civil Litigation Evidence. Compared to the evidence exchange systems in foreign countries, the author concluded that the system in China is of low legal validity, lacking mandatory and authority, comparatively rough and imperfect. Incorporated with regulations of multi-orientation, the system更多还原