【作者】 刘艳；

【导师】 唐磊；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 刑事诉讼证明标准是证据法中的一个基本问题，是一个理论性与实践性都非常强的问题。刑事证明标准这一问题现阶段已得到了学界的普遍关注，以此为题的内容层出不穷，内容繁复。特别是近几年，我国对证明标准的讨论非常热烈，形成了争鸣之势。但是，至今还未有学者作出一部系统、深入的专著。所以，笔者以此为题，来完成一篇毕业论文，当是存在很大的挑战。但让笔者庆幸的是，笔者吸取众多文章之精华，在分析中外刑事诉讼证明标准时开拓出了一个崭新的视角—以证明标准为主线重点论述了刑事诉讼证明标准阶段性的问题。通过这个视角来观察整个刑事诉讼证明标准的理论与实践，则可能有其独特之处。 分析任何一个理论性问题都应从其概念及内涵着手，虽落入俗套，但这是阐述问题的基础，所以本文也不例外。全文分为四章。第一章为“刑事诉讼证明标准概述”。首先对证明标准的概念作了考察，分析了学者关于证明标准概念的各种表述及理解上的不同。其次对我国三大诉讼法关于证明标准的规定作了概述，并将民事诉讼证明标准与刑事诉讼证明标准作了比较分析，对“一元制”与“二元制”观点进行介绍，并提出自己的观点：证明标准应遵循“二元制”理论，刑事诉讼证明标准与民事诉讼证明标准可以不一致，应实行刑高民低的标准。该部分还对刑事证明标准概念以及哲学依据作了介绍。第二章为“外国刑事诉讼证明标准评析”。介绍了英美法系国家和大陆法系国家刑事诉讼证明标准的理论与实践，对“排除合理怀疑”与“内心确信”的具体内容进行阐释，并分析了两大法系刑事诉讼证明标准的异同。不管是英美法系的“排除合理怀疑”还是大陆法系的“内心确信”，都是就案件的整体情况来说的，对证明标准更多还原

【Abstract】 The proof standard in the criminal procedure is a basic problem in evidence law, The proof standard in the criminal procedure has already got the widespread concern of the educational circles currently, taking this as the contents of to pile up one after another, the contents is complicated. Especially in the last few years, our country became to contention of a hundred schools of thought towards the discussion of proof standard. But, haven’t there been scholar to make a system and go deep into up to now monograph. So, the writer takes this as, complete a graduation thesis, be is exist a very big challenge. But let what writer rejoice BE, the writer absorbs the essence of numerous articles, at the analysis Chinese and Foreign certificate standard of the pertaining to crime litigation expand a brand-new of angle of view-with proof standard for the main line middle point discussed form litigation to prove a standard stage problem. Pass this angle of view to observe theories and fulfillment of the proof standard of the whole criminal procedure, then may have it the special place.The analytical and whichever ories’ problems all should begin from its concept and the content, although fall into convention, this is the foundation which elaborates a problem, so this text is no exception. The full text is divided into four. Chapter one for "the summarizing of the proof standard in the criminal procedure". Made an investigation to the concept of certificate standard first, analyzed scholar concerning prove standard concept of various express and comprehend a last dissimilarity. Secondly to our country three greatest litigation method concerning prove the standard provision made to say all, and prove civil case in court standard and pertaining to crime litigation proved standard to make more analytical, carry on introduction to" centralized leadership system" and" binary system " standpoint, and put forward an own standpoint. That part still proves standard concept and philosophy to the pertaining to crime according to made introduction. Chapter two for "the foreign pertaining to the proof standard in the criminal procedure ". The更多还原