【作者】 陈莉；

【导师】 唐磊；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 纵观人类文明的历史长河，司法鉴定制度作为当代各国司法制度中不可缺少的一部分，其最终确立是我们的法律文明不断发展、进化的结果。早在16世纪早期，英国一位叫做Saunders的法官就对英国法律愿意接受适格的专家的指导表达了自豪之情：“如果在我们的法律中出现有关其他科学或专业领域的问题，我们一般都求助于有关科学或专业领域的帮助。这一点在我们的法律中是值得骄傲和赞扬的。因为这表明我们并不轻视所有其他学科，而是认可并赞扬他们。” 今天，司法鉴定制度(或称司法技术鉴定)已经成为重要的诉讼证据制度之一，无论在法学理论，还是在司法鉴定实践中都占有极其重要的位置。然而，受理论水平与技术水平的制约，我国目前的司法鉴定制度存在很多缺陷。有鉴于此，2005年2月28日，全国人大常委会通过并颁行了《全国人大常委会关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》)，同年9月司法部又出台了《司法鉴定人登记管理办法》，对司法鉴定人和鉴定机构的管理、资质、法律责任等方面做出了统一的规定，大大完善了我国的司法鉴定制度，但在鉴定人出庭作证的规范方面仍有较为粗疏之嫌。鉴定人出庭作证，接受控(诉)辩双方的质证与询问，接受法官的调查，是鉴定人向法庭提供科学证据的活动，也是法院和当事人对鉴定结论进行审查，确认其证据效力的重要途径，因而是司法鉴定活动的重要环节，当然就涉及到鉴定人与质证内容的相关问题，并且主要是围绕这两方面展开的。本文的主要目的在于分更多还原

【Abstract】 Scanning our judicial civilization, we’ll find the institution of expert testimony, which is finally established as a result of the law evolution, has been a necessary part of the present judicial system. Since early stage of 16th century, Britain had been willing to accept the guide of a qualified expert in law. Saunders, a British judge, ever said: "If there’re some difficulties relating to other subjects in our law, we’ll usually turn to other specialties for help. I think it deserves to praise, because it indicates that we agree with other science and commend them but not underestimate them." According to this paragraph, we can see Saunders has a proper sense of pride to it.Today, the expert report has been one of important judicial evidence. It occupies a major place in not only the theory of law, but also the practice of law. However, being restricted by the level of theory and skill, the system of Chinese expert testimony still has a lot of defects. As a result, a Decision named The Administration of Expert Testimony was drafted and issued for enforcement by NPC Standing Committee in February 2005. Also in September 2005, The Enrollment Measures of Experts Testimony was passed. They set a unified rule about the administration, qualification and legal responsibility of expert, which will improve our system of expert testimony greatly. But there are still some drawbacks in the norm of expert witness. The expert should appear in court as a witness in order to更多还原