【作者】 顾婵媛；

【导师】 杨兴培；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法学院 ， 刑法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 犯罪预备是准备实行犯罪而被迫终止在着手实行前的一种未完成罪。在我国,刑法以总则条文明确规定对于犯罪预备予以处罚。但是,相关的理论研究尚未深入展开,专门性研究犯罪预备的文章,著作当中也只是少量论及,而犯罪预备的系统研究无论对我国的刑法理论完善还是刑事立法,刑事司法均能产生有益的影响。随着社会的进步,法治建设的宏伟目标的确立,我国刑事立法上的那种不作区分,原则处罚犯罪预备的立法已显得不合时宜,且与法治理念中的法律至上,人权保障,司法公正原则相冲突。预备行为是否入罪,不仅仅是制度设计问题,深藏在其后面的是对法律价值的认识问题。重新建构我国犯罪预备立法,使其与我国法治建设的目标相适应,已成为当务之急。因此,本文试图在已有研究成果的基础上,采用历史分析,比较分析和思辨的研究方法,对我国犯罪预备立法合理性进行深入而系统的阐述,并就犯罪预备立法模式进行重构,以期对理论和实践有所裨益。全文除导言外,共分四部分,约5,2000字,其中脚注约4,000字。第一部分是犯罪预备立法的历史回顾与比较分析。该章通过对古今中外犯罪预备立法规定的回顾与比较,来分析和评价其处罚犯罪预备的概况,特点及对后世的影响,对正确评价我国刑法上的犯罪预备有或多或少的助益。第二部分详细论述了我国犯罪预备立法的基本理论。本章基于对犯罪预备定义的界定,特征的剖析以及种类的划分,对其在刑法理论上进行定位,使其与犯罪阶段,故意犯罪形态以及相关概念区别开。第三部分在对现行刑法中犯罪预备立法模式进行分析的基础上,指出其刑法理论上存在的缺陷及对司法实践带来的负面影响,以期弥补刑事司法实践中的不足,达到更好的效果。第四部分通过对我国现行《刑法》中犯罪预备立法的反思以揭示问题的根本症结,并借鉴国外有关立法经验,完善我国预备犯的相关立法,以适应世界刑罚轻缓化的潮流。更多还原

【Abstract】 Preparation for a crime is an unfinished crime with the forced termination before starting. In China, the general provisions in the Penal Code ordain the crime should be punished. However, the relevant in-depth theoretical study has yet not started and specialized research articles and writings deal with only a small amount. And the systematic study of preparation for a crime is good for criminal theory , criminal legislation and criminal justice. As society advances and the grand goal of building the rule of law established, our criminal legislation which punishes the preparation for a crime without division has become obsolete, and breach the principle of the supremacy of law, protection of human rights and justice principles. That the act is convicted or not, is not just system designing but the understanding of legal value. The re-build of our legislation in order to make it in line with our objective of building the rule of law, has become imperative. Therefore, this paper attempts to anaylse the rationality of the legislation of preparation for a crime, on the basis of recent research results, using historical analysis, comparative analysis and critical research methods, and its re-build, with the aim of benefiting the theory and practice.This paper is divided to four parts, amounting 52,000 words, which contains footnote of 4,000 words. Part one is about the history and comparely analysis of the legislation on preparation for a crime. This chapter values the punishment on preparation for a crime and its characteristic and impact, through reviewing and analyzing the legislation on preparation for a crime. It is good to properly value the preparation for a crime in our criminal law.Part two is about the fundamental of our legislation on preparation for a crime. This chapter locates the preparation for a crime in the criminal theory, on the basis of defining it, analyzing its characteristics and carving up its class, in order to make it different from crime phase, form of intent crime and other relevant concept.Part three points out the theorical deficiency and its bad infection to justice, on the basis of analyzing the present legislation, in order to offset the deficiency of criminal justice and gain good effect/.Part four self-questions our present legislation on preparation for a crime in order to expose the sticking point and improve the relevant legislation, using the foreign legislation for reference, to meet the tide of lighter penalty.更多还原