【作者】 蒙旭；

【导师】 孟勤国；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 民商法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 国有企业经营权制度的立法目的，是赋予国有企业对抗所有人的不当干预的权利，使国有企业成为独立的市场主体，自主参与市场竞争。但国有企业经营权在现实中的作用却不尽如人意。理论上对如何看待国有企业经营权也存在争议。我国宪法决定了国有企业不能取得企业财产的所有权，这就使我们只能以所有权以外的物权形式来说明国有企业对企业财产的利用权利。但我国的用益物权制度却因自身理论的缺陷而无力解决国有企业经营权中存在的现实问题。本文提出，以平等保护物之归属与物之利用关系的新型物权理论——物权二元结构理论代替不合时宜的用益物权制度是解决国有企业经营权问题的前提。在这个前提之下，可以借鉴为大陆法系国家普遍采用的用益权制度中的相关规定来完善国有企业经营权具体制度。这也是本文的创新点之一。 本文的前言部分回顾了我国国有企业经营权制度的立法进程，指出国有企业经营权在现实中的困境。 第一部分介绍了现有解决国有企业经营权难题的两种理论，又对这两种理论进行了分析，指出不能通过法人所有权解决国有企业财产权问题，用益物权理论也不能合理解释国有企业经营权问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 The purpose of the system of the managerial power of state enterprise is authorizing the state enterprise to confront the unmerited interferences, and making the state enterprise to be the self-governed market participant to participate in market competition .But the practical effect of the managerial power of state enterprise is unsatisfactory .There are still controversies on the problem of the managerial power of state enterprise in theory .The Constitution of our country decided that state enterprise can not get the ownership of the enterprise property ,so we have to use other property form to explain the utilization right on the enterprise property of the state enterprise . But the system of usufructuary right of China can not resolve the practical problems of the managerial power of state enterprise for its born theoretic limitation .This article advance that it is the precondition to resolve the problems that to replace thedemoded the system of usufructuary right with the up-to-date real right theory-thesystem of dualistic framework of real right ,which protect ownership of property and utilization of the property equally .Under this precondition ,we can use relational provisions of the system of usufruct for reference to consummate the system of the managerial power of state enterprise .It is also one of the innovative point of this article.The preface of this article review the legislation course of the managerial power of state enterprise .It also point out the practical handicap of the managerial power of state enterprise.The first part of this article introduce and analyse two existing theories which are used to resolve the problems of the managerial power of state enterprise and then point out that neither the system of the legal person’s property nor the system of usufructuary right can be used to resolve the problems of the managerial power of state enterprise.The second part of this article farther open out the conflicts between the system of usufructuary right and practical requirement of the managerial power of state enterprise and analyse the reasons that we can not use the system of usufructuary right to consummate the managerial power of state enterprise .The article advance that it is the precondition that to replace the system of usufructuary right with the system of dualistic framework of real right .And we can use the system of usufruct to construct the provisions of the managerial power of state enterprise.更多还原