旅游合同研究

【作者】 王爱军；

【导师】 李霞；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 民商法， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 关于旅游合同，我国合同法未规定，本文旨在依据民法原理和国外有关旅游合同的研究，就旅游合同的成立、性质及特性；旅游举办人的权利义务，如旅游服务的提供、旅游内容的变更、对旅客的协力与处理义务、瑕疵担保责任、非财产性损害赔偿等；旅客的权利义务，如变更权、支付旅游费用等；还有当事人双方的合同解除及终止权、如何通过合同的格式化更好地保护旅客的权益等问题，参考相关学说判例及立法例，加以分析检讨，阐释其疑义，结合我国现有法律规定和实践中的做法，炮制正当性的理论和实证法上的说明，以期对我国旅游合同纠纷的解决有所裨益。具体地说，本文将从以下方面展开： 前言 在此部分，主要阐述了：作为人们主要生活方式之一的旅游，虽然有了较大的发展，但不绝如缕的旅游纠纷困扰着人们，为我国的旅游产业增加了不和谐音。对此，我国法律还没有做好充足的准备：不仅旅游立法欠缺，就连最具体的旅游合同在合同法通过时被否决(因旅游合同草案稿存在众多缺陷)。 第一章 旅游合同概述 通过对旅游合同概念及其特征的阐述，让我们清楚旅游合同不同于其他合同的特殊性，对该合同性质的剖析，使我们了解到尽管各旅游大国对此有不同的认识，但均在民法典中予以彰现，进而为我们从实际出发制定有名化的旅游合同提供了参考。 第二章 旅游合同的订立 本章从该合同的订立和合同当事人权利义务两个方面论述以下问题：本文通过比较旅游合同的订立和成立及生效的不同，说明旅游合同具有自身的特殊性。作者还对不同学说、立法司法实践之优点予以借鉴，明定旅游举办人应在提供旅游服务、协助及处理、通知及代负责任(由于旅游举办人对给付提供人事实上的控制不足，我认为应对旅游举办人的责任在一些情况下予以减免或限制)等方面承担义务和负担义务的范围。 第三章 旅游合同和格式化合同 旅游合同多数已格式化合同形式表现的，在格式化合同中旅客往往处于弱者地位。本文通过对旅游格式化合同来理论的分析，检讨如何对该合同进行规制，以更好地平衡双方当事人的利益。本章还对瑕疵担保责任加以着墨，作为一种严格责任，它将在内容、效力、减免及责任的存续上对旅游举办人产生较大影响。更多还原

【Abstract】 There is no regulations related "travel &tour" contract in Contract law. The theme of this article is written based on civil law theory and foreign theories related travel &tour contract. Concededly, reference in this article are also including the relative academic theories, court precedents and foreign legislations. The purpose of this article is try to analyze, review and clarify the issues as follow: the definition of travel and tour agency and the meaning of travel and tour contracts; the formation, nature and character of travel and tour contracts; the rights and obligations of travel agency such an providing travel and tour service, change the contents of travel and tour, duty to assist tourists in related matters, implied warranty of fitness for ordinary purpose, damage for waste of time due to the fault of the travel and tour agency, etc; the rights and obligations of tourists, such as receiving the travel and tour service under the contract, the duty to cooperate, payment of travel expenses, rights of replacement, etc.; as well as discharge of travel & tour contract. This article wants to analyze comparatively theories and cases in tourism developed countries and research our current laws and practices .the author would construct fair theory and instructions in positive law, and expects to benefit to the solution of the problem of tour contract.The thesis consists of six parts: to start with, the preface. Tourism, has developed fast since reform and opening, but controversy over "travel & tour" contract are arising constantly and becoming stumbling stock in tourism development, we don’t prepare sufficiently for the question: we are short of tourism legislations, furthermore, the most "travel & tour" contract was denied(draft of "travel & tour" contract has many defects),when contract law was voted.In chapter one, the author defines difference between "travel & tour" contract and other contracts by analyzing the concept and characterizations of travel contract, andconstrues specifically the nature of "travel & tour" contract in which many tour-developed countries have differences of views, these supply us references when enacting the named travel contract.In chapter two, the author compares the difference among the conclusion、establishment and entry into force of travel contract, and point out "travel & tour" contract itself has its更多还原