节点文献

儿童行为问题相关因素分析及社会技能训练干预的对照研究

A Comparative Study of Childhood Behavior Problems on Its Related Factors and the Efficacy of Social Skills Training

【作者】 王旸

【导师】 刘金同;

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 , 精神病与精神卫生学, 2006, 硕士

【摘要】 目的:调查儿童行为问题的现状,分析儿童行为问题的检出率,探讨儿童行为问题的自身、家庭、学校社会等方面的相关因素;探讨社会技能训练对儿童行为问题的效果,分析社会技能训练干预儿童行为问题效果的影响因素。 方法:采取整群抽样的方法,抽取济南市某小学一至五年级在校学生作为研究对象。研究过程可分为以下两部分。 第一部分:应用自编儿童基本情况调查表、Rutter儿童行为问卷父母问卷(Rutter)、家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)、父母养育方式评价量表(EMBU)进行调查。根据Rutter父母问卷总分大于或等于13分判断为行为问题儿童的标准将儿童分为正常组和行为问题组,分析儿童行为问题的检出率,并探讨儿童行为问题的自身、家庭、学校社会等方面的相关因素。 第二部分:将符合入组标准的行为问题儿童随机分为A组和B组,A组43人,B组44人,其中B组中有1名儿童脱落。训练方法为首先对A组儿童进行社会技能训练,B组空白等待,后对B组儿童进行相同内容的社会技能训练,而A组空白等待。训练总时间均为12周,每周1次,每次1小时。训练内容包括学会倾听、调节情绪、建立自信、换位思考、减少攻击性行为等。两组在干预前、干预后第12周末、第24周末分别进行Rutter父母问卷和Rutter教师问卷评定,以观察行为问题表现的改善情况及干预效果的影响因素。 结果: 1) 儿童行为问题的检出率:儿童行为问题的总体阳性检出率为14.35%。其中男生为18.71%,女生为9.74%。男女生行为问题阳性检出率存在显著性

【Abstract】 [OBJECTIVE] To investigate the prevalence of childhood behavior problems, analyze the prevalence of childhood behavior problems and explore the related factors on individual, family, school and social aspects; to probe the efficacy of social skills training in the treatment of children with behavior problems and analyze the influencing factors.[METHODS] The subjects were sampled from one primary school in Ji’nan, Shandong Province. The study was divided into two periods.In period one, a basic information questionary, The Rutter Scale, Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version(FES-CV) and Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforstran(EMBU) were administrated to all subjects. According to the score of the Rutter scale, all the subjects were divided into two groups, the normal children and the children with behavior problems, with a cut off score of 13 points. The prevalence of childhood behavior problems was calculated and the related factors of individual, family, school and social were explored.During period two, the children with behavior problems were divided randomly into two groups, Group A and Group B. Group A was consisted of 43 cases and group B 44 cases, but one case in Group B was dropped out during the study. Children in Group A were trained firstly on social skills while children in group B were free of any intervention. After the completion of the training program in Group A, the children in Group B were trained on the same skills as that

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 山东大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2006年 12期
  • 【分类号】B844.1
  • 【被引频次】14
  • 【下载频次】1134
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络