【作者】 荣如侠；

【导师】 丁文英；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文探讨的是建筑作品作者的著作权保护的相关问题。全文共分四个部分。第一部分主要是对有代表性的国际组织、国家和地区建筑作品范围的界定进行分析的基础上，提出笔者的看法，即建筑作品包括建筑物、建筑设计图和建筑模型。基于建筑作品的特殊性，建议对建筑作品在著作权法中作为一类独立的客体予以保护。并且着重论述了建筑作品的独创性以及对其进行判断的方法。第二部分主要阐述了建筑作品著作人身权与所有权的冲突与调和以及建筑作品复制权的行使与限制。建筑作品的人身权具有特殊性，权利人在行使其人身权时，可能发生著作权与所有权的冲突，在这种情况下，著作权通常要让位于所有权。建筑作品财产权中的复制权，是一项重要和复杂的权利，本文分析了作者复制权的行使和受到合理使用的限制，并对建筑作品合理使用的适用提出了建议。第三部分适用著作权侵权行为的归责原则和对著作权侵权行为的一般认定方法，在分析建筑作品著作权侵权行为的构成要件的基础上，对侵犯建筑作品著作权行为进行了分类。第四部分论述了侵犯建筑作品著作权行为的民事责任的适用。以我国现有的民事责任体系为基础，结合建筑作品著作权的特殊性，对各种责任方式的适用进行了探讨。由于我国《著作权法》立法起点高，但可操作性不强，我国现行民事立法中，还没有具体规定如何确定侵权人的赔偿责任。所以本部分着重阐述了建筑作品著作权的侵权损害赔偿责任的性质、赔偿额的确定以及精神损害赔偿额的确定。更多还原

【Abstract】 This article discusses constructs the work author’s copyright protection related question. The full text altogether divides four parts. The first part mainly is to has the representative international organization, national and the local construction work scope limits carries on the analysis in the foundation, proposes author’s view, namely construction work including building, building design drawing and building model. Based on the construction work particularity, suggested to the construction work in the copyright law took a kind of independent object protects. And emphatically elaborated the construction work originality as well as carries on the judgement to it the method. The second part mainly elaborated the construction work work personal rights and the property rights conflict and is well distributed as well as construction work duplication power exercising with the limit. The construction work personal rights has the particularity, the right person in exercises its person temporarily, possibly has the copyright and the property rights conflict, in this kind of situation, the copyright usually must yield to the property rights. In the construction work property rights duplication power, was an item important and the complex right, this article analyzes the author to duplicate the power to exercise and to receive the reasonable use the limit, and suitablly put forward the proposal to the construction work reasonable use. The third part is suitable the copyright abuse of authority to turn over to the responsibility principle and generally recognizes the method to the copyright abuse of authority, in the analysis construction work copyright abuse of authority constitution important document foundation, to encroached upon the construction work copyright behavior to carry on the classification. The fourth part elaborated infrigement construction work copyright behavior civil liability being suitable. Take our country existing civil liability system as the foundation, the union construction work copyright particularity, has suitablly carried on the discussion to each responsibility way. Because our country "Copyright Law" legislates the beginning high, but may be operational is not strong, in our country present civil legislation, but also does not have specifically to stipulate how determines the right infringement person’s compensation responsibility. Therefore this part emphatically elaborated the construction work copyright right infringement damage compensate responsibility nature, the compensation volume determination as well as the spirit damage compensate volume determination.更多还原