【作者】 张军；

【导师】 陈忠；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 马克思主义哲学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 决定论与非决定论、历史决定论与反历史决定论是哲学在二十世纪激烈争论的一个问题。随着自然科学的进步,在自然科学领域中,不但非决定论已经站不住脚,而且机械决定论也已被证明是有很大局限性的。代替非决定论和机械决定论的,是辩证决定论。虽然在自然科学领域,辩证决定论获得了明确的胜利,但是在社会领域,反历史决定论还是喧嚣一时,其中的著名代表人物就是卡尔·波普尔,他在其代表作《历史主义贫困论》和《开放社会及其敌人》中对历史决定论提出了挑战,并把矛头直指马克思主义唯物历史观。本文在综合国内批判波普尔反历史决定论思想的基础上,进一步指出其根本错误在于不从社会实践出发去理解社会规律和不辩证地理解社会规律,从而导致其反历史决定论。而马克思主义唯物历史观的正确之处恰恰在于从社会实践出发去理解社会规律和辩证地理解社会规律,从而发现并证明了历史决定论。更多还原

【Abstract】 The debate between the determinism and the non-determinism, and the debate between the historical determinism and the anti historical determinism, are one of the severe disputing philosophy problems in the twenty century. With the progress in nature science, not only the non-determinism has not a leg to stand on, but also the mechanical determinism has been proved that its availability has much limitation in nature science field. The dialectical determinism replaces the non-determinism and the mechanical determinism. The dialectical determinism has a clear success in nature science field, but anti historical determinism is still having a strong influence in social science field. The famous representative character of the anti historical determinism is Karl Popper. His magnum opuses,《The Poverty of Historicism》and《The Open Society and Its Enemies》, animadvert on the historical determinism, especially on Marxist materialistic historicism. This thesis is based on the domestic animadvertments on Popper’s anti historical determinism. This thesis points out the Popper’s anti historical determinism is false. Its falsity is that to understand the social law is not based on the social practice and dialectic. The falsity results in Popper’s anti historical determinism. Marxist materialistic historicism is right. Its rightness is just that to understand the social law is based on the social practice and dialectic. The rightness results in discovering and proving historical determinism.更多还原