【作者】 徐瑾；

【导师】 张永泉；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 诉讼法， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 民事保全的意义在于保障法院判决或其裁定的执行以及在纠纷解决前及时保障当事人的合法权益。以保全的客体为标准,民事保全制度可以分为财产保全和行为保全两种类型。事实上,许多法制比较健全的国家和地区行为保全和财产保全是处于同位阶的,二者共同构成完整的民事保全制度。遗憾的是行为保全制度在我国现行的民事诉讼法中尚未自己的历史和应有的地位。目前在关于民事诉讼法修改的大讨论中,大多数学者对在新的民事诉讼法中建立行为保全制度达成了共识。然而,对于具体如何构建我国的行为保全制度,学术界讨论得还不够深入。因此笔者试图通过借鉴国外以及我国台湾地区的民事保全制度,将我国目前海事诉讼与知识产权诉讼领域有关行为保全的规定扩大到一般的民事诉讼领域,提出构建我国行为保全制度的初步设想,进而使我国的民事保全制度成为财产保全和行为保全并重的二元体系结构。更多还原

【Abstract】 The system of preservation is designed to maintain the execution of judgments and orders and to protect the lawful rights and interests of the parties in time. Take the object which preserved as the standard, the system may be divided into property preservation and act preservation. In fact, in many countries and regions, the entire civil preservation system consists of property preservation and act preservation. But the act preservation does not have its history and status in our country. When the scholars discussed the revision of the civil procedure law, they mostly agreed to the proposal that we should set up act preservation in the new code. However, they mentioned little about how to. So by reference to the civil preservation system of foreign countries and Tai-wan regions of our country, the writer wants to make this thesis extend from the current scattered regulations in the maritime procedure law, patent law,trademark law and copyright law, further into the field of ordinary civil action, and bring act into the scope of the preservation, and then establish a system for act preservation of civil litigation in our country, to form a dual systemic frame that lay equal stress on property preservation and act preservation.更多还原