论环境民事诉讼因果关系之证明

【作者】 叶芬良；

【导师】 田平安；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文从环境资源法学和民事诉讼法学相结合的角度，以历史与实证，演绎与归纳的方法，对环境民事诉讼因果关系之证明作了较为系统和深入的研究，并在此基础上对如何完善我国环境民事诉讼因果关系证明问题提出一点粗浅的建议。全文由前言和四大部分组成，约三万两千字。 前言部分主要说明了选题的意义和作者的写作意图。 第一部分主要分析了环境民事诉讼的产生和发展、概念、特征等。本文认为，环境民事诉讼的出现是人与自然矛盾激化的必然结果，是经济发展与环境保护的对立寻求法律救济的必然结果。 第二部分则主要分析了因果关系的一般理论，包括因果关系的含义、特征及传统民事诉讼中因果关系的认定理论。本文认为传统的因果关系证明理论在环境民事诉讼中已不能适应诉讼实践的需要，应当有所突破。 第三部分针对环境民事诉讼的特点，紧紧抓住环境侵权的复杂性、不确定性和高技术性等特点，认为应当采用因果关系推定方法来证明环境民事诉讼中的因果关系；其次，分析了因果关系推定的基本含义及效力；再次，采用比较和实证分析的方法，系统而深入地分析了国外环境民事诉讼因果关系证明的主要理论和司法实践。 第四部分主要分析我国环境民事诉讼因果关系证明的现状及相关法律规定，并初步提出了完善我国环境民事诉讼因果关系证明的设想。首先，分析了因果关系推定在我国立法上的缺失及其对环境民事诉讼带来的不利影响；其次详细评析了我国环境民事诉讼中因果关系证明的司法实践；最后从立法体例，因果关系证明方法，相关制度完善等方面对我国环境民事诉讼因果关系的证明的完善提出初步的设想。更多还原

【Abstract】 In this paper, the proof of causation in the civil litigation about environment are studied and explained systematically and completely, which includes the theory of the civil litigation about environment, the theory of the original causation proof in the civil litigation, some representative theories and their evolution about the proof of causation in the foreign countries, and some suggestions about completing the proof of causation in the civil litigation about environment in China on the above base. There are about thirty-two thousand characters in the paper, which is arranged as five sections.Preface: explain the significance of this topic selecting and the study area.It is mainly focused on concept, features and the development of the civil litigation about environment in the section one. The civil litigation about environment results from sharp contradiction of human and nature and legal relief from the opposition between economy development and environment protection.In Section Two, I analysis the theories of causation, including the concept, features and some original proof theories of causation in the civil litigation. I think the original proof of causation in the civil litigation about environment must be improved.In Section Three, several kinds of representative theories and their evolution about the proof of causation in the civil litigation about environment will be introduced deeply by means of comparision and examples, directing at the features of the civil litigation about environment, holding the causes of environment damage such as its compound, complex and accumulation. Causality deduction is the inevitable tendency in case that original causality can not fit for suit practice.On the base of former three sections, a number of improvement will be provided for the proof of the causation of the civil litigation about environment in China The singal causality can not satisfy the practice of laws application because of complication and multi-kinds of environment civil litigation. Use justice of laws as the highest value, decrease the requirements to causality proof, adopt multi-dimension causality deduction, choose corresponding methods of causation calculation. At the same time, several relative systems must be improved.更多还原