节点文献
在线仲裁法律问题研究
On Legal Issues of Online Arbitration
【作者】 黄进贤;
【导师】 邓杰;
【作者基本信息】 华侨大学 , 民商法学, 2006, 硕士
【摘要】 本文以在线仲裁为研究主题,综合运用实证法、比较法、历史分析法,对在线仲裁的界定、电子仲裁协议的效力、在线仲裁地、在线仲裁庭审、在线仲裁裁决五个问题展开详细论述,并在此基础上,探究我国现行仲裁制度的不足,提出具体的完善措施。全文分为前言、正文6章、结论三部分,将近8万字。第一章为导论,主要分析了在线仲裁的定义、产生和发展的原因及其对传统仲裁制度的冲击和挑战。其中,在线仲裁对传统仲裁制度的冲击和挑战也即本文第二章至第五章所要分析和解决的问题。第二章为电子仲裁协议的效力,主要探讨了数据电文和电子签名的效力、网络环境下当事人的行为能力、电子代理人的缔约能力、电子错误、电子格式合同中仲裁条款的效力。第三章为在线仲裁地,主要论述了在线仲裁地缘何落空及如何填补。尽管采用仲裁“非当地化”理论即可使在线仲裁彻底摆脱仲裁地的束缚,但这一方案目前并不可行。各国应顺应仲裁地意念化趋势,借助仲裁本座解决在线仲裁地问题。第四章为在线仲裁庭审,主要分析了电子证据和正当程序两大问题。本章首先阐述了赋予电子证据以证据资格的必要性,并提出确定电子证据证明力的具体标准。其次从宏观和微观两个层面剖析了在线仲裁与正当程序的关系,提出在线仲裁可以满足正当程序要求。第五章为在线仲裁裁决,主要分析了在线仲裁裁决国籍的确定和在线仲裁裁决的执行。其中,特别探析了根据《纽约公约》承认和执行在线仲裁裁决面临的新问题以及自治执行这一新兴的在线仲裁裁决执行方式。第六章为在线仲裁与我国仲裁制度,阐明了我国现行仲裁制度对在线仲裁的回应与不足,并提出了补充和完善我国《仲裁法》以及构建和完善配套立法的具体措施。
【Abstract】 This dissertation is on online arbitration. It makes a scrutiny into the following issues by methods as historical research, comparative analysis, and empirical analysis: the concept of online arbitration, the seat of online arbitration, online hearing, and online arbitration award. This dissertation also discusses the limitation of our current legislation on arbitration and puts forward some suggestions to promote it. This paper consists of 6 chapters besides the introduction and conclusion, about 80,000 words. Chapter 1 introduces the concept of online arbitration, the reasons for its origin and development, and what challenges it brings to the traditional arbitration institution. The challenges mentioned above are also the problems to be discussed in chapter 2 to chapter 5.Chapter 2 mainly discusses the effectiveness of electronic arbitration agreement. In this chapter the following issues are observed: the validity of data telegram text and electronic signature, the capacity needed to sign an arbitration agreement on Internet, the capacity of electronic agent, electronic mistake, and the validity of arbitration clauses enclosed in electronic form contract.Chapter 3 discusses the seat of online arbitration. This chapter argues that it is infeasible to adopt“the denationalization theory”and“the seat of arbitration theory”should be adopted to resolve the problems arising
【Key words】 Online Arbitration; Arbitration Agreement; the Seat of Arbitration; Due Process; Online Award;
- 【网络出版投稿人】 华侨大学 【网络出版年期】2006年 12期
- 【分类号】D925.7;D997.4
- 【被引频次】8
- 【下载频次】515