【作者】 侯晓琴；

【导师】 王远明；

【作者基本信息】 湖南大学 ， 民商法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 公司作为股东间契约自由的产物,其成立或解散应当取决于股东的意志。当股东在公司中的权益被侵犯,公司又不能就恢复股东权益或解散公司形成合意时,权益遭受侵害的股东就应当有权通过各种救济方式维护自身权利,申请司法解散公司就是是救济方式中的一种。但是在公司法修订以前,由于历史的和现实的原因,我国并没有关于公司司法解散的规定。立法的缺失导致了股东权利的流失和审判实践的混乱。新《公司法》意识到了这一点,首次明文规定了司法解散的情形,但是规定过于笼统,缺少系统的操作程序,所以归根结底还是很难体现司法救济的有效性与及时性。同时,由于大股东滥权行为的屡禁不止,小股东的权利维护和公司的运经营管理现状令人担忧,全面构建我国公司司法解散制度刻不容缓,势在必行。司法解散公司制度,不仅为中小股东面对不得已事由时提供了维权的工具,对促进大股东履行对中小股东的诚信义务和勤勉义务有其积极意义。同时该制度在大股东为分配是否均衡等事项出现不可调和纠纷时也提供了一个彻底解决纠纷的法律途径。针对我国司法解散制度的立法现状和司法实践,以典型案例作引子,对存在的不足及导致的弊端进行检讨,从法学和经济学等不同角度为构建这一制度寻求有力的理论基础,阐述该制度的立法价值和现实条件。通过比较法学的分析方法,大胆借鉴国外的立法经验,结合我国实际情况,提出构建公司司法解散制度的具体设想。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since corporation is the outcome of free contracts among shareholders, its foundation or dissolution will depend on their will. As the rights of shareholders are violated, while the corporation can’t make agreement on resuming their rights or dissolving corporation, the shareholders trespassed should be entitled to safeguard their rights through such various remedies as applying for dissolution of corporation. Prior to the revision of Corporation Law, however, there is no clause about corporation dissolution in our country due to historical and realistic reasons. Legislation absence leads to loss of shareholders’rights and confusion of trial practice. On account of this, New Corporation Law first stipulates the situation of judicial dissolution, but this stipulation is so superficial without systematic operation procedure that it is difficult to realize the effectiveness and punctuality of judicial remedy. Owing to frequent right abuse of chief sharekholders, invalid right safeguard of subordinate sharekholders as well as poor corporation management, constituting a sound corporation judicial dissolution law allows no delay.Establishing corporation dissolution law cannot only provide a tool for subordinate shareholders, but also can prompt the chief shareholders to perform integrity and diligence on the former part. Furthermore, it offers a thorough legal solution to disputes such as resulting from uneven distribution among chief shareholders.With typical cases as an introduction, the writer analyzes the defect of legislation status quo and judicial practice of judicial dissolution law in our country, as well as the subsequent adverse outcome, and also points out that it is an urgent task to perfect present legislation and set up judicial dissolution law. Besides, the writer seeks for the convincing theoretical evidence in terms of both of law and economics and expounds the legislation value and realistic condition of this law. Through employing analysis method of comparative law, learning from the legislation experience abroad and applying to the factual situation in our country, the writer finally proposes the detailed assumption of establishing corporation judicial dissolution law.更多还原